If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
That depends on how big your captured clip is:
352*288/320*240 (PAL/NTSC) not interlaced
704*576/640*480 (PAL/NTSC) Interlaced
------------------ INTEL PIII550 MSI 6163 G400Mill 32MB SGRAM + RRG
SBlive
192 MB RAM CAS2
43GB HDD Space!(Actual 40GB) (13+30 Quantum drives)
Pioneer 104S DVD 10x CD 40x SLOT IN
SONY CRX100E 4/2/24 CDRW
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
More complicated than that Technoid. It's true that from 1/4 frame downwards Matrox treats all AVI as frame based. Not everyone does tho.
Also, although full and half-frame default (under Matrox) to field based, this can be overridden by the editing package.
And lastly, no matter which you capture in, the final rendering can be user-chosen and doesn't have to match the input type (OK, it's fairly suicidal to try, but it IS possible).
Of course, unless your final aim is output to VCR, interlacing (ie fields) is not overly useful
As to when to use interlaced video, you need it any time the video is targeted to be displayed on an interlaced TV screen (99% of 'em now); VCR, VideoCD, SuperVideoCD, DVD....whatever.
When the target display is a computer or progressive scan display then the preferred mode is usually frame, but even then you might run into the need for interlaced video in some sequences because it handles fast motion better than frame video.
Dr. Mordrid
[This message has been edited by DrMordrid (edited 03 April 2000).]
Comment