I'm looking for a video editing solution to replace an ageing Mac where I work, please bear with me, video editing isn't really my field.
We create individual frames on our render farm as .tga files and then compile them on the Mac into its native format before editing and laying down to video.
Today I took a 100 frame animation and a 500 frame animation down to a local computer store to try the same process using an RT2500. The editing and laying down part worked great, but I had a huge performance problem with compiling the individual frames.
I tried the 100 frame animation first, it compiled the first 50 frames nice and fast, but the second 50 took an age. The HDD went absolutely berserk. I didn't bother with the 500 frame animation after that, it would simply have taken too long.
I guess this is more of a system setup issue. The system was pretty ropey, running Windows ME, 256Mb RAM, some unknown 7200 RPM IDE disk as the editing drive, Athlon based (exact speed unknown), but its a demo machine in a store so I can't exactly mess with it too much! Having said that, I would like to try and get best performance I can in the situation I'm in, we are only a small company and cannot afford to shell out for something that might not work as intended, cheap as it may be. Can someone tell me what settings will give me the best results in Premiere for this sort of situation? Also, does anyone else do this sort of work, what system specs are you running on and what sort of performance do you get?
Any machine we buy will be running Win2k and will have at lest 512Mb RAM, if that would help the situation.
I had another problem too, the frames I took with me are 768x576, but the PAL setting on the RT2500 was 720x576, so every single frame had to be resized, I guess this added to the problem but I really don't know.
I'm going back to the store tomorrow with some correct size frames to see if that helps, any other tips would be great too.
The people here claim that 768x576 is standard full PAL res, and I can't see why the RT2500 would use a different size.... who is right??
We create individual frames on our render farm as .tga files and then compile them on the Mac into its native format before editing and laying down to video.
Today I took a 100 frame animation and a 500 frame animation down to a local computer store to try the same process using an RT2500. The editing and laying down part worked great, but I had a huge performance problem with compiling the individual frames.
I tried the 100 frame animation first, it compiled the first 50 frames nice and fast, but the second 50 took an age. The HDD went absolutely berserk. I didn't bother with the 500 frame animation after that, it would simply have taken too long.
I guess this is more of a system setup issue. The system was pretty ropey, running Windows ME, 256Mb RAM, some unknown 7200 RPM IDE disk as the editing drive, Athlon based (exact speed unknown), but its a demo machine in a store so I can't exactly mess with it too much! Having said that, I would like to try and get best performance I can in the situation I'm in, we are only a small company and cannot afford to shell out for something that might not work as intended, cheap as it may be. Can someone tell me what settings will give me the best results in Premiere for this sort of situation? Also, does anyone else do this sort of work, what system specs are you running on and what sort of performance do you get?
Any machine we buy will be running Win2k and will have at lest 512Mb RAM, if that would help the situation.
I had another problem too, the frames I took with me are 768x576, but the PAL setting on the RT2500 was 720x576, so every single frame had to be resized, I guess this added to the problem but I really don't know.
I'm going back to the store tomorrow with some correct size frames to see if that helps, any other tips would be great too.
The people here claim that 768x576 is standard full PAL res, and I can't see why the RT2500 would use a different size.... who is right??
Comment