Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DIVX slow or fast motion?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DIVX slow or fast motion?

    What is the difference between DIVX slow motion and DIVX fast motion?

  • #2
    Thay are the same codec, just different encoding algorythms. Most people would think that Fast motion looks better, but the opposite is true. Fast motion uses a hardcoded DRF (Detail reduction filter) of 5x-6x that results in higher compression than taht of slow motin of 2x. The file size of fast motio would be smaller, but lower in quality due to the higher compression level. In 99% of cases it is recommended to use only slow motion as it generally looks better.

    Another option is to try using an encoder like NanDub (a version of VirtualDub) that performs multipass and uses both codecs resulting in a much better looking end product. It is a free program and there is an extensive guide and some good forums here. It may look a little daunting at first, but the defaults are pretty good.
    WinXP Pro SP2 ABIT IC7 Intel P4 3.0E 1024M Corsair PC3200 DCDDR ATI AIW x800XT 2 Samsung SV1204H 120G HDs AudioTrak Prodigy 7.1 3Com NIC Cendyne DVR-105 DVD burner LG DVD/CD-RW burner Fortron FSP-300-60ATV PSU Cooled by Zalman Altec Lansing MX-5021

    Comment


    • #3
      Fast Motion will only give better results on heavy action scenes at very low bitrates.

      I just use the new http://www.divx.com and the 2-pass VBR.
      Gigabyte GA-K8N Ultra 9, Opteron 170 Denmark 2x2Ghz, 2 GB Corsair XMS, Gigabyte 6600, Gentoo Linux
      Motion Computing M1400 -- Tablet PC, Ubuntu Linux

      "if I said you had a beautiful body would you take your pants off and dance around a bit?" --Zapp Brannigan

      Comment


      • #4
        I think newer version of divx 4.01, actually switch on the fly(between scenes) between the algorythms (part of mpeg 4 spec).

        The lastest DIVx 4.01 has no explicit fast/slow motion setting

        Comment


        • #5
          I haven't played with the newest DivX although it is installed on my machine. The playback quality is better, even for clips encoded with the older 3.11 and Nandub. If it does do multipass and switch between fast and slow automatically, it sounds like the best option. Question is how configurable is it and does it do Scene change detection?
          WinXP Pro SP2 ABIT IC7 Intel P4 3.0E 1024M Corsair PC3200 DCDDR ATI AIW x800XT 2 Samsung SV1204H 120G HDs AudioTrak Prodigy 7.1 3Com NIC Cendyne DVR-105 DVD burner LG DVD/CD-RW burner Fortron FSP-300-60ATV PSU Cooled by Zalman Altec Lansing MX-5021

          Comment


          • #6
            My naive impression of the difference between the two codecs. Say for example you choose a bitrate of 1500 kbps.

            Low-motion operates so that the average bitrate is equal to what you set. So the encoder will try to keep the bitrate at as close to 1500 kbps as possible.

            Fast-motion operates so that the maximum bitrate is equal to what you set. So the encoder will try to keep the bitrate beneath 1500 kbps.

            At least, that's what I've read, and I've seen smaller file sizes as a result.

            - A

            Comment


            • #7
              Sciascia, it seems to be very configurable since it has options for changing quantizers and such. The scene detection is pretty good, and the key frame setting is actually maximum interval not exact interval. So it'll put in key frames whenever it thinks there is a scene change.

              Aryko, I think you are basically correct, but I believe the fast was pretty bad at determining how much it should compress, and usually overdid it.
              Gigabyte GA-K8N Ultra 9, Opteron 170 Denmark 2x2Ghz, 2 GB Corsair XMS, Gigabyte 6600, Gentoo Linux
              Motion Computing M1400 -- Tablet PC, Ubuntu Linux

              "if I said you had a beautiful body would you take your pants off and dance around a bit?" --Zapp Brannigan

              Comment

              Working...
              X