Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stupid SVCD question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stupid SVCD question

    The problem: Since I don't use the VCD/SVCD formats normally (they're IMO inferior to DivX considering quality/filesize ratio) I have absolutely no experience in how to create a SVCD that can be played in a standalone-player. But now I want to burn a CD for a friend that wants to use it in such a device.

    I have already converted the video to mpeg2 with tmpeg (using the PAL SVCD profile). Now I have a file of ~1.1GB. What do I have to do to get two "compatible" CDs. What to use to split the file? How do I have to name the file and what layout (folders...) does the CD need? And last how to burn it (I have Nero, but without the VCD/mpeg plugin).

    (one further question: Are you allowed to change the bitrate of the video to a higher / lower one than the one that's used in tmpegs SVCD-profile or maybe use VBR and still stay compatible with standalone devices?)
    But we named the *dog* Indiana...
    My System
    2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
    German ATI-forum

  • #2
    Uuuh, thats more than one question. I'll give it a try.

    > I have already converted the video to mpeg2 with tmpeg (using
    > the PAL SVCD profile).

    That's the quick and dirty solution. I hope you set the right
    properties for the source file. Also, I heard that some peolpe
    tweak GOPs and Matrices, but for the "one time" thing here it
    will be appropriate.

    > What to use to split the file?

    As you are so lucky to use tmpegenc to encode, you have everything on your hand already. Under File/Mpeg tools... you
    may find everything you need. There is a split tool. It will take
    a while, though...

    > How do I have to name the file and what layout (folders...)
    > does the CD need?

    You do not take care about these things. Let your authoring or
    burning software do that for you.

    For authoring, I like Ulead MovieFactory a lot. It's easy and make
    nice looking VCDs, SVCDs, and DVDs, the CD based formats even
    with nice menues. But fot he tome beeing, use Nero.

    > And last how to burn it (I have Nero, but without the VCD/mpeg
    > plugin).

    You do not need the plugin, as it is only used to encode, what
    you already did. Chose SVCD from the Wizard. Deselect that you
    want menues, unless you know what you want. Drop the MPEG
    file to the left. Burn.

    For more information, there is a lot of links. The best sites in
    my oppinion are the one from mb1 and (as I think you are
    German www.edv-tipp.de (hier erst auf den Pfeil drücken und
    dann nach SVCD/DVD klicken).

    Good luck,
    Karlson.
    suchen, da wird wirklich alles ausführlich erklärt)



    (one further question: Are you allowed to change the bitrate of the video to a higher / lower one than the one that's used in tmpegs SVCD-profile or maybe use VBR and still stay compatible with standalone devices?)
    Best Regards,
    Karlson.
    ______________________________

    My setup: not sexy, but stable...
    Mobo: Gigabyte GA-7XIE4 (Irongate)
    Bios: Version FAD beta
    CPU: AMD TB 1300/200FSB
    RAM: 640 MB PC-100 noname
    OS: XP SP1
    Video: Matrox Marvel G400 TV
    Sound: SB Live Value
    Disks: 40GB Maxtor, 120GB Seagate and 80 GB Highpoint RAID0/Samsung

    Comment


    • #3
      The deck itself first must be SVCD capable. Many more than a year or so old are not. Some of these also have a limitation in that they don't support CD-R.

      IF this is not an issue (check http://www.vcdhelper.com 's DVD deck list to see) you can do very nice SVCD's in TMPGEnc by;

      1. select the SVCD preset (DUH!)

      2. If DV footage go to Options/Environmental Setting and select "Interpolate YUV from 4:1:1 to 4:4:4".

      3. Go to Settings/Advanced and check the Deinterlace box. Now doubleclick on its name and in the dialog select Even Field (adaption) as the type.

      Using adaptive deinterlacing gets rid of interlacing artifacts before encoding. The output will still be interlaced if you haven't changed it in the main menu. Check before encoding to be sure.

      4. If there are dark regions that need brightening open the Simple Color Correction filter and tweak the Gamma a tad.

      5. Choose your encoding method. I prefer CQ VBR.

      6. Encode, but be prepared for a wait.

      This file will work fine with most authoring softare including MSPro's DVD Plugin or Uleads DVD MovieFactory. DVD Plugin will need the latest patches though. DVD MovieFactory is a steal.

      To set higher bitrates for xSVCD's you can either;

      1. Select CBR. This will unlock the birtate dialog below it. You can also use the Settings button next to the mode dialog, but it's redundent.

      2. Select anything else and click the Settings button next to the mode dialog.

      I'd probably go no higher than about 3400 kbps, but some decks choke at 3000 kbps. The VCDHelper site often lists how high each deck it lists can go.

      In the Settings/CQ and CQ-VBR dialogs you'll find a Quality slider. Crank this up to kick up the quality at the price of larger files.

      Dr. Mordrid
      Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 24 January 2002, 14:13.
      Dr. Mordrid
      ----------------------------
      An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

      I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks a lot for the answers, I guess I'll try it with a RW first (the player does support CDR and RW as well as mp3, VCD, SVCD and XSVCD, but apparently only up to 2500KBps). On his TV he won't notice anyway....
        Last edited by Indiana; 25 January 2002, 18:12.
        But we named the *dog* Indiana...
        My System
        2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
        German ATI-forum

        Comment


        • #5
          @Doc: for what reason would you de-interlace when producing an SVCD? The normal material would be interleaced, the MPEG2 would be interleaced? I would only switch fields maybe, if it is
          necessary when source material and player differ...
          Best Regards,
          Karlson.
          ______________________________

          My setup: not sexy, but stable...
          Mobo: Gigabyte GA-7XIE4 (Irongate)
          Bios: Version FAD beta
          CPU: AMD TB 1300/200FSB
          RAM: 640 MB PC-100 noname
          OS: XP SP1
          Video: Matrox Marvel G400 TV
          Sound: SB Live Value
          Disks: 40GB Maxtor, 120GB Seagate and 80 GB Highpoint RAID0/Samsung

          Comment


          • #6
            Very often you will see feather artifacts in interlaced footage that has horizontal motion in it.

            Delacing witih Even Adaptive makes these portions VERY clean indeed when it goes to the MPEG encoding engine.

            AFTER encoding it gets written to the output file as interlaced, fulfilling the needs of the SVCD spec but without the artifacts.

            I've seen enough footage shot in lace to know that somewhere, somehow these will find their way into the video unless you run around using a 1/1000 shutter speed all the time. Hardly anyone does for lighting reasons so.....

            Terry
            Dr. Mordrid
            ----------------------------
            An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

            I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks for the explanation Doc. I always catch a lot of flack from others about using smart deinteralce (same as adaptive I assume) and then frameserving to my encoder. I could not explain the exact reason, all I knew is that it looked better. Now I have a "matter of fact" response.

              I also use a low level of temporal cleaning to remove as much noise as possible without smoothing the video. This helps the encoder alot as well. Any thing that is detected as motion is just sucking up bandwidth that could be used for "true" video for P/B frames. You won't necessarily see a filesize difference in CBR, but VBR may make a difference. The biggest improvement is in overall quality at lower bitrates.
              WinXP Pro SP2 ABIT IC7 Intel P4 3.0E 1024M Corsair PC3200 DCDDR ATI AIW x800XT 2 Samsung SV1204H 120G HDs AudioTrak Prodigy 7.1 3Com NIC Cendyne DVR-105 DVD burner LG DVD/CD-RW burner Fortron FSP-300-60ATV PSU Cooled by Zalman Altec Lansing MX-5021

              Comment


              • #8
                Sorry, I still think it's not logical to de-interlace interlaced
                material that is intended to be used to produce an interlaced
                SVCD intended to be played on a tv set.

                But anyway, as long as it works and everybody is ok...
                Best Regards,
                Karlson.
                ______________________________

                My setup: not sexy, but stable...
                Mobo: Gigabyte GA-7XIE4 (Irongate)
                Bios: Version FAD beta
                CPU: AMD TB 1300/200FSB
                RAM: 640 MB PC-100 noname
                OS: XP SP1
                Video: Matrox Marvel G400 TV
                Sound: SB Live Value
                Disks: 40GB Maxtor, 120GB Seagate and 80 GB Highpoint RAID0/Samsung

                Comment


                • #9
                  Karlsson, you're right for most interlaced TV broadcasts, they're better looking if you keep them interlaced when watching on the TV, smoother movements. On the monitor, of course you will get a lot of "weaving". But recently I came across quite some TV broadcasts that seemed to be from a progressive source and just broadcasted "interlaced" 'cause that's how the PAL standard is. For these, it' really better to deinterlace them first.
                  I'd suggest deinterlacing for everything that's intended to be viewed on computer monitors as well. Besides most compressors seem to really get much higher ratios with deinterlaced video than with interlaced ones, so it might be an advantage to sacrifice some smoothness in motion against overall image-quality if you're doing lower bitrate conversions.
                  But we named the *dog* Indiana...
                  My System
                  2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
                  German ATI-forum

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Understood and acepted. That's realy a good reason.

                    I had interlaced material that I produced with a video editor
                    that also contained quickly moving subtitles from time to time
                    to say: "Now the baby is 12 day old...". It has been produced
                    with the intention to record it on VHS tape and now should
                    make it on an SVCD.

                    The only chance to get this moving text crisp and sharp on an
                    SVCD played on a tv set was use the interleaced b order matrox
                    file and ecode it interlaced lower (unchecked) with CCE SP.

                    All other ways with what de-interlacer ever logically resulted in
                    smear effects on the text, because the text was generated by
                    MSP 6.0 and weaved into the pictures.
                    Best Regards,
                    Karlson.
                    ______________________________

                    My setup: not sexy, but stable...
                    Mobo: Gigabyte GA-7XIE4 (Irongate)
                    Bios: Version FAD beta
                    CPU: AMD TB 1300/200FSB
                    RAM: 640 MB PC-100 noname
                    OS: XP SP1
                    Video: Matrox Marvel G400 TV
                    Sound: SB Live Value
                    Disks: 40GB Maxtor, 120GB Seagate and 80 GB Highpoint RAID0/Samsung

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Most of the footage I end up delacing (and no, it's not everything) is that which exhibits feather artifacts in motion scenes.

                      Given that those frames are already degraded visually delacing them to mitigate the situation isn't exactly criminal.

                      Dr. Mordrid
                      Dr. Mordrid
                      ----------------------------
                      An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                      I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X