I have about 5 min of video (no sound) showing a scientific phenomenon (filmed through a microscope). I wanted to put this onto a CD format playable on ordinary stand-alone DVDs (suitable, modern, ones, of course).
I burnt a PAL SVCD, but this had just sufficient "jaggies" to detract from the observation I was wishing to point out.
I then had the idea of rendering it in DVD MPEG-2 format (704x576, instead of the 480x576 pixels). With the MSP 6.5 DVD plug-in, it was not possible to record it to a CD format. With Nero, I tried to do the same and it told me it was an incompatible format, but it gave me the chance to override this problem and burn it, anyway. It played delightfully in the stand-alone, without a glitch. Interestingly, I would have thought that the file would have been about 1.5 times that of the SVCD (based on no. of pixels), but it was about twice the size, which puzzled me at first.
I then, out of curiosity, repeated the experiment with a couple of minutes of ordinary video. This time, the video was perfect but the sound was chopped into, very roughly, one second on and off bursts, so this technique is not valid where sound is a required factor. This also explains the difference in file size: the standard obviously was adding "blank sound" to fill in the chops.
However, I did what I wanted to do
I burnt a PAL SVCD, but this had just sufficient "jaggies" to detract from the observation I was wishing to point out.
I then had the idea of rendering it in DVD MPEG-2 format (704x576, instead of the 480x576 pixels). With the MSP 6.5 DVD plug-in, it was not possible to record it to a CD format. With Nero, I tried to do the same and it told me it was an incompatible format, but it gave me the chance to override this problem and burn it, anyway. It played delightfully in the stand-alone, without a glitch. Interestingly, I would have thought that the file would have been about 1.5 times that of the SVCD (based on no. of pixels), but it was about twice the size, which puzzled me at first.
I then, out of curiosity, repeated the experiment with a couple of minutes of ordinary video. This time, the video was perfect but the sound was chopped into, very roughly, one second on and off bursts, so this technique is not valid where sound is a required factor. This also explains the difference in file size: the standard obviously was adding "blank sound" to fill in the chops.
However, I did what I wanted to do
Comment