Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can it be done?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can it be done?

    Hi!

    I am quite new on the forum and I hope someone can help me.

    I have got a G400TV card, the OS is Win98 (tried switching to xp, but came back happily ) and I have got a lot of vhs tapes that I want to import.

    I admit that I have no experience at all and I need help on two different matters, so maybe someone could be so kind and explain me shortly what to do or just point me to an exhaustive tutorial. I don't want to know why, just how (for now at least )

    I tried looking on my own, but I don't know where to start from
    The only clear thing seems to be the following: the bigger the file is, the better the result is.

    First of all: technical issue.
    I live in Italy --> PAL colour system.
    I need to convert into mpeg (or whatever else - that's issue no. 2) some very old vhs NTSC tapes (1984-1985), but the G400 won't accept to record them.
    I have got a vcr capable of reading ntsc, but that's a Ntsc Playback only and the G400 says the film is protected or unstable.
    I am going to install the macrovision patch, I owe the tapes, so I am legally entitled to have backup copies, but I think that the problem is that the output signal is not really Ntsc, but somewhere between the frequencies of Pal and Ntsc

    Am I mistaken?
    But, my question is, if I can perfectly see it on screen, why can't I record it?
    Is it there a possibility I don't know of?

    Second question... which format.
    I want to import those tapes, but what then?
    I want to preserve as much quality as possible. Hard disk space is not really an issue, since I only need to record about 10 minutes at a time.
    The files will be temporarily placed on cd-rom. I don't have a stand-alone dvd or vcd-player, so I might transfer the movies on a dvd later, but as for now I just want to keep them safe on a more durable support for a few years, then I'll decide what to do with them.

    I don't have much authoring software (what Matrox gave with the G400 is not exactly much!), I have virtual dub and Ulead Studio (the version that came with g450) and a few codecs (I don't even use which one better suits my needs), but everything is pretty much confused/ing.

    Quality is very important to me, so I don't mind spending time on that. Those tapes are old and rare, they still play good, but they are sport videos, with a lot of movement and quick actions.
    If I miss frames during the recording... the magic is lost.

    Thank you very much in advance!

    Erika

  • #2
    check at www.vcdhelp.com

    "OO"
    celeron 1.4ghz tualatin/Slot-T adapter/AX6BC/Matrox G-200 Marvel16mo/320Rams-133@100/SBLive oem/DR-CDrw 16X/Matsuhita cd-rom 32x/Raceleader FF wheel/WD Caviar 40G 7200 X 2 +Fuji 11G 5400 HDS/ Q71/Win98 top notch/DX9.0a/DSL/and faith in a good pc setup...

    Comment


    • #3
      "I think that the problem is that the output signal is not really Ntsc, but somewhere between the frequencies of Pal and Ntsc "

      Yes you're VCR is most likey outputing "PAL-60" (some DVD player do to)
      you're TV is automaticy swithing 50/60 fields ,but the matrox is not
      PAL = 704x576 at 50 fields ( 25fps )
      PAL-60 = 704x480 at 60 fields ( 30fps )
      NTSC = 704x480 at 60 fields ( 30fps )

      Some VCR's can output pure NTSC (try different vcr)

      "But, my question is, if I can perfectly see it on screen,
      why can't I record it? Is it there a possibility I don't know of"

      Did the MV patch fix the problem then ? please let us know
      My PC :Matrox G400TV AMD Duron750mhz@850mhz,256Mb,Abit KT7133raid,10gb ibm,10gb seagete,20gb7.2k-rmp fujitsu,LG CDWR 40x16x10
      win98se
      Entertainment : P150mhz@160mhz,16mb,VX MBoad,PCI-TNT with TV/out,H+ dvd,Creative x5 dvd

      Comment


      • #4
        tsuby

        Yes you're VCR is most likey outputing "PAL-60" (some DVD player do to)
        you're TV is automaticy swithing 50/60 fields ,but the matrox is not
        PAL = 704x576 at 50 fields ( 25fps )
        PAL-60 = 704x480 at 60 fields ( 30fps )
        NTSC = 704x480 at 60 fields ( 30fps )

        Some VCR's can output pure NTSC (try different vcr)
        Ok, so I guessed this right.

        I'd like to use a different vcr, that'de be much easier, but being PAL the standard system in Italy, so called multi-standard vcr are not so easy (or cheap ) to find. I'd have to bring one home from abroad.

        I could not try anything with the macrovision patch yet because I am struggling with unexpected hardware problems (mobo is due to replacement on Monday).
        Since the system is going to be formatted on Monday I don't feel like spending another night adjusting settings which are being erased in three days.

        And anyway I could not do much with the computer resetting about every 35 minutes... I would not even know which peripheral to blame for the failures.
        I hate buggy motherboards. Especially if they cost 250$ and breakdown unexpectedly while I'm on holiday and ready for capturing!!!!

        Anyway I'll be on holiday next week too, so I'll be producing a lot of videos and I'll try any setting I can think of.

        I'll keep a log of all tries and then I'll let you know if I solved the problem or not.

        By the way, I already know that matrox software won't record pal at 30fpfs. Is it there a software with this capability?


        Thanks for everything!

        Erika

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi!
          I have had this problem to (live in Sweden where there is Pal system to).

          I installed the macrovision patch and got rid of half the problem (!?) and then captured via Adobe Premiere 5.1 (that was the newest version when I did this, probebly works with 6.0 to).

          The only problem with this was that it only produced one file (usally it splits up the files when you capture it with other applecations so they won't get unreadable but not here) so you have to do some counting and stop capturing after xxx aumount of time and then stop the tape and capture xxx aumont again, this is not so hard to do if you capture a bit to much eatch time and do it when they change camera angle...

          I hope this helps!
          If anyone nows of an easyer way please post, othervise try it...

          Regards

          Cyberhof
          Last edited by cyberhof; 1 February 2002, 23:46.

          Comment


          • #6
            I found a NTSC video tape , and had no problems capturing

            I'm using matrox VT 1.55
            VurtualDub for capturing (set to NTSC)
            The video player is Sharp vc-s2000
            Capturing was done via the S-vhs connection
            My PC :Matrox G400TV AMD Duron750mhz@850mhz,256Mb,Abit KT7133raid,10gb ibm,10gb seagete,20gb7.2k-rmp fujitsu,LG CDWR 40x16x10
            win98se
            Entertainment : P150mhz@160mhz,16mb,VX MBoad,PCI-TNT with TV/out,H+ dvd,Creative x5 dvd

            Comment


            • #7
              It was about time, isn't it?

              Hi everybody once again.

              I am sorry I could not post the results of my various attempts sooner, but I did not actually attempt anything until a few days ago.

              The fact is that the ntsc-capable VCR is about as far from the computer as it could be (third floor vs. basement!), so I just had to wait and get rid of parents, brother, various relatives visiting and so on, before taking official possess of the basement and starting doing things seriously

              The results are GOOD!

              Well, not as good as I hoped, but I can survive with what I have.

              I am now recording using Avi_IO and after I found the right settings I can record without too many difficulties.

              The thing that turned the trick was the source setting (after I patched the drivers for macrovision), as Zeb7 said.

              Actually, when I turn on Avi_IO and the vcr, the software says that I am watching a PAL movie, but, if I want to import it, I have to manually change the setting and tell the software/capturing driver, that I am recording NTSC. After that the screen changes its size and I totally miss the upper part of the screen itself.

              After this I start recording. I get a few drops (1%-2% max.), which is fare more than usual for me, but I can understand, since the tapes are 18 to 20 years old
              However, when I play the movie back, it is complete and the proportions are correct.
              I have some interleaving problems by watching it on the monitor, but on my tv-set it looks great.
              It really seems to me that the worse the movie looks on monitor... the better it does on tv

              But the best part is the mpg2 encoding!
              I use tmpgenc and its "wizard" "correctly" assumes that I have a NTSC avi file.
              BUT, the project is for PAL mpg2. If I try to change that... the results are creepy. If I say PAL is ok, then the file comes out perfectly

              However, since the things work ok, I don't even want to know why
              I just assume that the computer "thinks" it is NTSC because it "looks" like Ntsc, even though it is nor PAL nor NTSC. It is confusing for me already.

              However I still have a problem, and I don't know how to solve it.
              Better said, I do know, but I cannot afford it

              I have a 20GB Hard disk. There are 4 partitions (used to be 5), c has 7GB, d & e 3 each and f has 7 GB (f is new and contains no data yet).
              I used to save all avi files on c, but I don't like it, because c is where I keep the OS and I want it to be "clean".
              That's why I created f, deleting some stuff I was no longer using.

              The problem is, the disk seems not quick enough for the datarate I wish to use. I know I just need to buy a new hard disk... but I need the bucks for other things for now and I don't see why should I waste 7GB of free space.

              Moreover, the datarate problems only comes up if I record ntsc on partition f. And not immediately!

              The first 2GB are recorded ok. After that the I_O buffer starts running up and down and, finally I run out of buffers.

              WHY???

              Is that because ntsc is 30fps and pal 25?
              And anyway... why is the first file ok and the other ones not?

              I need to record 5-10 minutes each time, I cannot stop and process every single avi file...

              Have you got any ideas???

              Thanks

              Erika

              Comment


              • #8
                Permanent swap file ( my settings are / min 60mb max 500mb ) in win98se
                Defragment all partitions, shut down firewalls ( if possible) and virus scanner, and other background progs
                use Ctrl + Alt + Delete to end all tasks (but leave systray & explorer running)
                Update motherboard drives ,

                These thing will improve you're capture performance.

                Then restart the computer after capturing to get the virus scanner and
                background programs running again.

                Their is a link to this info on Matrox & other websights with tips , has anyone got these Links for Tsuby ?
                My PC :Matrox G400TV AMD Duron750mhz@850mhz,256Mb,Abit KT7133raid,10gb ibm,10gb seagete,20gb7.2k-rmp fujitsu,LG CDWR 40x16x10
                win98se
                Entertainment : P150mhz@160mhz,16mb,VX MBoad,PCI-TNT with TV/out,H+ dvd,Creative x5 dvd

                Comment


                • #9
                  Recording to a separate physical harddrive, not just another partition on your main system drive, is prefered.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hi everyone

                    Permanent swap file ( my settings are / min 60mb max 500mb ) in win98se
                    Defragment all partitions, shut down firewalls ( if possible) and virus scanner, and other background progs
                    use Ctrl + Alt + Delete to end all tasks (but leave systray & explorer running)
                    Update motherboard drives ,
                    That's what I do every time, but unfortunately it does not help that much

                    Recording to a separate physical harddrive, not just another partition on your main system drive, is prefered.
                    I said that too at the beginning of my post. That's what I plan to do, but I cannot buy a new hard disk now.
                    My hardware can support ATA133, so that's alright. BUT I'll be buying the new disk in two months and I am looking for something that can help me now.

                    Thanks anyway

                    Erika

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As stated before the only reliable way to do no-drop captures is to have a separate disk.

                      Your problems about drops when capturing to the F: partition is probably to do with seek times. It is logical to assume that the F:/ partition is far way from the C:/ partition physically on the disk. So when your O/S causes the system drive to be accessed the heads have to move a relatively long way from F to C and back again. Plus any directory lookup that may be needed. By which time you run out of buffer space for the capture and ooppssss.... there goes another frame. If your system is needing to swap or page then the problem is magnified greatly.

                      If you really can't afford another disk yet, you have a couple of options...

                      1/ Live with it and keep saving your pennies up.

                      2/ Try to do the capture on the partition closest to the system partition (logically this would be the D: partition). It won't fix the problem but it could well reduce the number of dropped frames.

                      3/ (OK I lied about a couple!)
                      You used to capture to the C: drive but you didn't say you had any dropped frames? If this is the case then go back to capturing on C: - the o/s doesn't care about how 'messy' this looks and no one is going to say "Nice video - shame about the messy disk structure though"
                      Last edited by Phil Pugh; 21 May 2002, 04:26.
                      Phil
                      AMD XP 1600+ ,MSI K7TPro2-RU, 512Mb, 20Gb System, 40Gb RAID0 , HP 9110 CD-RW, Pioneer DVD/CD, Windows 2000 Pro SP2, ATI RADEON 7000, Agere OHCI 1394, DX8.1, MSP 6.5, Midiman USB AudioSport Quattro (4 channel 24bit/96Khz sound unit)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        A separate Drive is not that important my C: and D; drives go sleep after 3mins of capturing anyway

                        here's a little but true story ;
                        i was capturing a 40mins clip at 704x576 pal HQ 44.1 Stereo audio
                        using VirtualDub with 40mb buffer (total)
                        Drives C;D: when't sleep the capturing was going well and i forgot
                        drive D; was sleeping and clicked on it in windows explorer Dho!!
                        the system stalls and it take about 5sec for that drive to spinup.
                        when i checked the VirtualDub capture window i had no dropped frames

                        the end

                        it took a long time to get my Win98se to capture Hardware MJPEG
                        at about 10% to 30% CPU in the VirtualDub program
                        VIA drivers and sound card troubles
                        My PC :Matrox G400TV AMD Duron750mhz@850mhz,256Mb,Abit KT7133raid,10gb ibm,10gb seagete,20gb7.2k-rmp fujitsu,LG CDWR 40x16x10
                        win98se
                        Entertainment : P150mhz@160mhz,16mb,VX MBoad,PCI-TNT with TV/out,H+ dvd,Creative x5 dvd

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A separate Drive is not that important my C: and D; drives go sleep after 3mins of capturing anyway
                          Which means you are capturing to a separate drive!


                          And you highlight the problems of letting your drives spin down during captures - it's only takes the O/S to decide to do something (eg swap) on the O/S disk (which has spun down) and it can cause problems. Starting up a non-video, non-O/S drive shouldn't affect the capturing performance - the o/s will multi-task this sort of work.

                          Unless you are running a battery powered system there is no point in letting your drives spin down. Most of the stress caused to disk drive motors occurs during spinning up - best to keep them spinning.
                          Phil
                          AMD XP 1600+ ,MSI K7TPro2-RU, 512Mb, 20Gb System, 40Gb RAID0 , HP 9110 CD-RW, Pioneer DVD/CD, Windows 2000 Pro SP2, ATI RADEON 7000, Agere OHCI 1394, DX8.1, MSP 6.5, Midiman USB AudioSport Quattro (4 channel 24bit/96Khz sound unit)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Phil is 100% right.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I have a JVC vcr (pal) that can playback NTSC tapes in "pseudo-PAL" mode which is PAL at 60 Hz, 525 lines.

                              I was unable to capture the output using the hardware codec, but it worked fine using YUY2+Picvideo under Win98 (VT 1.52). Maybe that's an option for you?
                              Resistance is futile - Microborg will assimilate you.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X