Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Render Speed Comparisons: Pentium vs. Athlon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Render Speed Comparisons: Pentium vs. Athlon

    Render speed chart is growing and revealing some interesting trends!



    What strikes me is how much more efficient the Athlon is when it comes to MPEG encoding.

    It's incredible.

    Jerry

  • #2
    I don't use Premiere or MS, so I'm a bit in the dark on the exact test procedures.

    Which MPEG encoder is used? It will greatly depend on the software. Cfr Tom's test on dual Athlons systems. A P4 beat a dual Athlon, when using software that was specifically P4 optimised.

    I'm particularly interested in P4-Athlon comparisons for Tmpeg and Cinemacraft SP (especially the latter, still haven't seen a coder that delivers better quality)

    Neko

    Comment


    • #3
      the problem with CinemaCraft is that the SP version isn't multithreaded, but the more expensive version of CinemaCraft is... I wouldn't be surprised if the 'highend' version had better SSE/SSE2/3DNow! implementations as well... but that version is almost unpayable for individuals.

      Comment


      • #4
        For the purposes of the Premiere6 vs. MSPro 6.0/6.5 test the Ligos MPEG plugin is used in Premiere and the built-in Ligos encoder is used in MSPro 6.5. This is because both of these use the Ligos Go-Motion engine, which makes the test even. Both are encoding to the DVD, 5500 kbps & CBR.

        CBR is used because MSPro 6.0 cannot use VBR due to bugs in its version of the Ligos encoder. Thank you Ligos

        Dr. Mordrid
        Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 11 March 2002, 16:14.
        Dr. Mordrid
        ----------------------------
        An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

        I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

        Comment


        • #5
          Where did you hear Cinemacraft SP doesn't support dual processors? The Cinemacraft webpage advises duals for better performance.

          Are you perhaps mixing up with the Lite version ($300 or so, while SP is $2000)?

          Neko

          Comment


          • #6
            CinemaCraft states this for all their products;

            "High speed encoding can be assured by using microprocessors that incorporate Intel's MMX and SSE, or AMD's Enhanced 3D Now! technologies. A computer that has dual Pentium III microprocessors, of at least 800 MHz, is recommended for real-time encoding of Full D-1*.

            Shown below are system requirements for the entire Cinema Craft Encoder product line.

            * CCE-Pro supports real-time encoding of Full D-1."

            Now....does that mean that only CCE-Pro supports dualies or that only it supports full frame with dual support?

            Bad wording.....

            Dr. Mordrid
            Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 12 March 2002, 06:49.
            Dr. Mordrid
            ----------------------------
            An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

            I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

            Comment


            • #7
              the product specifications page clearly states that CCE-Pro supports Dual CPUs, while that doesn't show up in the SP version, so I am quite certain that the SP version isn't multithreaded.

              CCE-SP:


              CCE Pro:


              look in the 'hardware' section of the second link

              If you think that USD 2000 for the SP version is expensive, then I guess you'll drop your jaw when you'll see the price of the Pro version.

              Comment


              • #8
                not convinced yet

                have to try it. I don't recall where, but I am certain someone told me CCE SP works very well on dual machines, in multithreaded mode.

                Neko

                Comment

                Working...
                X