The latest C't magazine (German paper edition, on the shelves today) has an elaborate and in-depth technical test of various brands of DVD-R and DVD+R discs.
They verified the number of errors after burning versus the allowed number by the DVD specs, HF signal, tracking etc. It's a very technical article, so I can't translate it in just a few minutes, if there's interest in it, I'll try next weekend. (unless someone else here wants to give it a go?)
Short summary: cheap discs suck Good results from Maxell, TDK, Mitsubishi (Verbatim), Sony... Bad from Princo, Datatrack, Ritek...many more brands tested.
Very obvious: large differences in quality between various DVD-R. DVD+R is more level (easier to make) playing field. However, the best DVD-R discs are better than best DVD+R discs.
The article promotes DVD+R nonetheless, since it's cheaper to make, and has less copy protection for consumers.
They also test the latest DVD-R drives. Sony gets thumbs up but only because it has dual standard support. For best quality writing, even at 4x, the Pioneer A05/105 wins by a large margin.
J-kun
They verified the number of errors after burning versus the allowed number by the DVD specs, HF signal, tracking etc. It's a very technical article, so I can't translate it in just a few minutes, if there's interest in it, I'll try next weekend. (unless someone else here wants to give it a go?)
Short summary: cheap discs suck Good results from Maxell, TDK, Mitsubishi (Verbatim), Sony... Bad from Princo, Datatrack, Ritek...many more brands tested.
Very obvious: large differences in quality between various DVD-R. DVD+R is more level (easier to make) playing field. However, the best DVD-R discs are better than best DVD+R discs.
The article promotes DVD+R nonetheless, since it's cheaper to make, and has less copy protection for consumers.
They also test the latest DVD-R drives. Sony gets thumbs up but only because it has dual standard support. For best quality writing, even at 4x, the Pioneer A05/105 wins by a large margin.
J-kun
Comment