I finally got around to doing a short speed test the comparing VideoTools.net's VideoServer and PluginPac frameservers.
Setup:
15,887 frame DV type1 video (~2:13 worth of video) with no effects at all.
TMPGEnc settings;
NTSC DVD
2-pass VBR at 6000 kbps
DC = 10
Motion search = Normal
Rendering times
Malual export & encode: 13:26
VideoServer: 13:05
PluginPac: 28:11
The choices couldn't be more obvious.
If you're interested in price you go with PluginPac.
The rub is that it's so slow that even with no effects the render will be much slower than manual encoding. With numerous effects its lack of speed is interminable and even the convenience advantage of frameserving evaporates.
If you want speed you go with VideoServer.
With no effects the speed issue is a wash vs. manual encoding, but it still offers convenience. With effects it offers a significant speed advantage (my experience is ~25-30%) over saving a disk file and loading that into your encoder.
Dr. Mordrid
Setup:
15,887 frame DV type1 video (~2:13 worth of video) with no effects at all.
TMPGEnc settings;
NTSC DVD
2-pass VBR at 6000 kbps
DC = 10
Motion search = Normal
Rendering times
Malual export & encode: 13:26
VideoServer: 13:05
PluginPac: 28:11
The choices couldn't be more obvious.
If you're interested in price you go with PluginPac.
The rub is that it's so slow that even with no effects the render will be much slower than manual encoding. With numerous effects its lack of speed is interminable and even the convenience advantage of frameserving evaporates.
If you want speed you go with VideoServer.
With no effects the speed issue is a wash vs. manual encoding, but it still offers convenience. With effects it offers a significant speed advantage (my experience is ~25-30%) over saving a disk file and loading that into your encoder.
Dr. Mordrid
Comment