Have you considered buying a DV Camcorder with analog - DV conversion?? Does the same as the ADVC-100 but also records video. That's the way I went..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DV Capture card?
Collapse
X
-
Not all, still in perfectly good operating condition DV cams have a AV in function .
@$NZ530, for one of these is a lot but still a lot cheaper than a new cam.
Conversion of old and hard to process VHS material is the problem.Clem Reid
Toshiba P200 notebook
Dual core 2.16Ghz
2Gb Ram
2 x 160Gb HDD
XP Pro
DVD Multi drive
Intel P4P800 865PE
2GB DDR333
1 x 120Gb SATA Seagate 7200
WXP Pro
A06 DVD Writer
Samsung CDR/RW
Intel 815EP P111 1ghz
512mg 133Ram
40Gb ATA Seagate 7200
200Gb ATA Seagate 7200
WXP
Samsung CDR/RW
Poineer DVD Rom
1 X 250Gb ATA Seagate 7200 in caddie
1X 250GB Maxtor in Caddie
Comment
-
Here's my experience with Dazzle DV-Bridge (same device type as Canopus ADVC-100 but not so good).
These devices are seen by the computer as they were a DV camcorder.
When You get a DV stream on the computer from an analog source, the coding is done by the converter (Dazzle or Canopus).
Once on your PC the stream is compressed/decompressed (when needed) by the MS codec (or a commercial one if you buy and install it).
If using Premiere, finally you can choose two different types of project (DV or AVI) for outputting your stuff.
Choosing DV will result in a DV stream, usually coded with MS DV codec, that you can send to a DV camera via 1394; choosing AVI will result in the old analog way of life. In this case you can send the analog out to the Canopus box that will re-convert in DV with his codec, and from there to your DV camera.
As converter I now use my Sony TRV80 camera DV-Analog passthru with excellent results.
Brambus
Comment
-
Morgoth
Yes
Yes
Yes
The quality, with critical comparisons and DV-out in analogue from a semi-pro camera (direct, not via DV tape) is superb and is as good as or better than my old Marvel in 99% of situations. It is also a lot easier to use than an analogue-in card using RGB, MJPEG, HuffYUV etc.
The MS DV-1 codec, from DX9 onwards, is practically as good as the MC one. Most critical persons would find little difference.
I'm not certain that cheap cameras have the same quality of DV<>analogue conversion as a custom box, such as the ADVC-100 but I cannot justify this assertion. Perhaps others have made direct comparisons.Brian (the devil incarnate)
Comment
Comment