If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The closest thing I've seen to an unbiased test (ie, by someone who didn't appear to have a vested intrest either way) indicated that -R had a slight lead (a few percentage points) in compatibility with standalone DVD players. That test included many different DVD recorders, several software packages, dozens of DVD players, and lots of different media. Sorry, I don't have a link or remember where I saw it. It was only a few months ago though.
+R has the recording speed advantage right now. -R has a slight cost (and maybe availability) advatage.
For test burnings I only use +RW. They are alot quicker. However for distribution to the end user only Verbatim -R disks. Would rather pay a bit extra for the quality.. Down in my part of the world there is some real cheap chap being sold..
Here also in OZ -R at 50cents each. These are okay if you play no more tha a few times and don't burn more than 4gb.
junkmalle
I do burn a test to RW each time for a new project as you suggest and I have had varied results with both + & - on a variety of recognised brand names. IE TDK Verbatim etc.
I guess it is a matter of suck and see
Des
Gigabyte GA-8IPE1000 Mother Board
Intel 3.01GHZ CPU
1024 mb KingMax DDR ram
RT X10
Millenium G550
Main HDD Seagate 40gb
2nd HDD Seagate 120gb
Win XP SP2
Adobe Premiere 6.5
DVDWS 2
Turtle Beach Santa Cruz
DVD Burner Sony DRU-510A
Sony HandycamDCR-PC100e
Comment