Haig:
From reading the postings on Matrox's Win2K Video Tools problems, It's clear Matrox could suffer from many defections among the "prosumer" users of it's products. Since hardware MJPEG compression with the G200 / G400 under Win2K is not in the offering, why couldn't Matrox "unhide" the YUY2 capture option in Video Tools and allow for the selection of software capture codecs, eliminating the need for third party capture programs like Virtualdub or AVI-IO? Obviously this is an option only for those who have the processor power available, but those are the folks wanting to use Win2K anyway.
If Matrox doesn't want to contribute the developement time, it could probably be outsourced to any of our many very sharp code jockeys in the forum.
Forgive me if I over-simplify the matter. I'm interested in what everyone else thinks of this (admittedly old) proposal.
Kevin
From reading the postings on Matrox's Win2K Video Tools problems, It's clear Matrox could suffer from many defections among the "prosumer" users of it's products. Since hardware MJPEG compression with the G200 / G400 under Win2K is not in the offering, why couldn't Matrox "unhide" the YUY2 capture option in Video Tools and allow for the selection of software capture codecs, eliminating the need for third party capture programs like Virtualdub or AVI-IO? Obviously this is an option only for those who have the processor power available, but those are the folks wanting to use Win2K anyway.
If Matrox doesn't want to contribute the developement time, it could probably be outsourced to any of our many very sharp code jockeys in the forum.
Forgive me if I over-simplify the matter. I'm interested in what everyone else thinks of this (admittedly old) proposal.
Kevin
Comment