Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thinking of moving your NLE to the Mac? Think again.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thinking of moving your NLE to the Mac? Think again.

    The latest macOS news, comment, reviews and features from the experts at Tom's Guide


    Looks like Apple is no immune to problems. Perhaps when you actually start to sell software in numbers problems crop up. Welcome to the big leagues Apple.

    How about a little data loss to go along with that OS sir?

    Perhaps the most troublesome of the problems has been a data loss issue caused by Finder, which performs a function on Macs similar to that of Explorer in Windows. In Leopard, when Finder moves a file from one drive to another, it deletes the file from the originating hard drive, without first checking to see if the file arrived safely on the destination hard drive. If anything goes wrong during the file transfer, such as a momentary power glitch on the destination hard drive, the file would then be destroyed on both hard drives.

    May I suggest a little hard drive failure to go with that data loss?

    In an unrelated issue, data recovery firm Retrodata has found a disturbing hard drive failure rate in some Apple Macbooks.
    And now the blue screen of death is part of the Apple OS.

    Thanks to Leopard, the dreaded Blue Screen of Death is now a part of the Mac operating system. When I first tell this to Mac users that haven't yet upgraded to Leopard, I usually hear something like "Yeah, I get Blue Screens of Death when I use Windows on my Mac". No, that's not quite what I mean - Blue Screens of Death are occurring not only in Windows, but in Leopard as well.

    But wait there's more.

    Leopard has been plagued by a series of other problems as well. There are graphics artifacts followed by freezes, which may be caused by the new operating system's increased use of the Mac graphics card. A poster at AppleInsider.com reports returning four new iMacs because of this problem. A search for Freeze or Lock or Hangs in Apple's Leopard discussion groups returns the maximum allowable 500 hits.

    Oh boy.

    There are also two bugs in the usually trouble-free Mac firewall. The first caused the firewall to be installed turned off by default, which some Mac users didn't find out about until they ran into problems. The second refused to allow some third party applications to access the Internet, including, of all things, World of Warcraft. Yeah, that'll be good for building support among gamers!

    Behold the mighty Apple censoring complaint threads!

    There are a variety of other reports, including a Mac Pro becoming completely inoperative after a Leopard upgrade. One user asked, Is it me, or is Leopard just a mess?. Apple locked the topic, preventing replies. Another user echoed my sentiments at the start of this article by asking Is ANY part of Leopard ready for release? Worst product from Apple so far. Here's a shock, the entire thread was censored. And amazingly, despite all of the above, and everything else we've seen go wrong since Leopard debuted 3 weeks ago, at apple.com/mac/, an Apple ad on the left side of the page says "Leopard just works".

    Now I am not saying the Apple OS isn't a good system. It is. But like any software when you have big numbers you have various compatibility issues.

    And that is the sound of the other shoe dropping...
    - Mark

    Core 2 Duo E6400 o/c 3.2GHz - Asus P5B Deluxe - 2048MB Corsair Twinx 6400C4 - ATI AIW X1900 - Seagate 7200.10 SATA 320GB primary - Western Digital SE16 SATA 320GB secondary - Samsung SATA Lightscribe DVD/CDRW- Midiland 4100 Speakers - Presonus Firepod - Dell FP2001 20" LCD - Windows XP Home

  • #2
    Except for Linux, which gets obviously better with every major distribution update, its all been downhill in the PC world since Windows 2000.

    I'd hopes for Apple until they pulled the rug out from under the PowerMac clones.

    Still with it Unix roots, OS X I could live with for video editing. If you plan to be productive, jumping in for every upgrade ASAP is generally counter-productive.

    I'm still running old Linux versions on various machines because they are reliable and do everything that is required of them, making any "improvements" from upgrades illusory.

    --wally

    Comment


    • #3
      I generally agree with you Wally. Except for the fact that I think XP is as good or better than 2000. If I remember correctly you have a BIG problem with the activation started in XP.
      - Mark

      Core 2 Duo E6400 o/c 3.2GHz - Asus P5B Deluxe - 2048MB Corsair Twinx 6400C4 - ATI AIW X1900 - Seagate 7200.10 SATA 320GB primary - Western Digital SE16 SATA 320GB secondary - Samsung SATA Lightscribe DVD/CDRW- Midiland 4100 Speakers - Presonus Firepod - Dell FP2001 20" LCD - Windows XP Home

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by wkulecz View Post
        Except for Linux, which gets obviously better with every major distribution update, its all been downhill in the PC world since Windows 2000.
        Yes!!!
        But XP, seven years after, is very CAPABLE. Better than Win 2K, but nothing REAL new.

        Vista, probably, will be a WinME. Nobody rembembers that S.O. Never existed.

        Comment


        • #5
          If I remember correctly you have a BIG problem with the activation started in XP
          That, and the Fisher-Price look.

          In what way is XP "better" than Windows 2000? Always seems slower to me on the same hardware as W2K. I've been working with both since each was released and still much prefer W2K.

          On any dual boot XP W2K systems I've set up I quickly quit booting into XP except when I need to evaluate if an issue with the software I write might be an XP vs W2K issue. I develop on W2K, the XP issues that arise have so far always been "policy editor" issues in the way others setup their systems and are thus out of my control, although I usually can find a work around.

          I predicted if XP and activation were accepted, the next version would be far more invasive. Vista proves I was correct.

          So far none of my code has had issues running on Vista, but that of our partners sure has.

          --wally.

          Comment


          • #6
            Leopard has major security issues with it's email client as well...

            With Apple's reluctance to share it's problems (reminding eveyone in our organization of how the Soviet Union handled Chernobyl), and how previous vendors have chosen to address this (Novell, anyone?) has led use to a "no confidence" vote: Our Security Team has DENIED Leopard's use in the environment until further patches are available. This marks the very first time we have ever denied the use and development of an OS wholesale.

            RE Windows XP: If you're not a systems administrator you wouldn't understand just what a good OS XP really is: it is by no means perfect, but it is a quantum leap past Windows 2000 in terms of reporting and remote manangement. It is very easy to manage using a number of different methods both using native Windows tools or 3rd. Party tools.

            I just loaded up a box with Windows XP SP3 RC1 build 3244 and it is amazing the difference: Faster, more WMI options and much better RDP features. There are over 1000 Security fixes (~100), Fixes (~400+) and updates (~350+) rolled into this release. Some of the oldest problems with SP2 are fixed...like the "always on" firewall rule everyone had to script around as well as a new sysprep (yay!).
            Hey, Donny! We got us a German who wants to die for his country... Oblige him. - Lt. Aldo Raine

            Comment


            • #7
              XP Pro with all the patches rocks. XP Home, not quite so much. And Wally, you DO know you can switch to Classic Windows display and eliminate that "Fisher Price" look, right?

              XP seems to handle multimedia much better than W2K does, although both would be top contenders for best MS OS ever, Right behind Win98SE and DOS 6.2 (Vista need not apply).

              Kevin

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by KRSESQ View Post
                XP seems to handle multimedia much better than W2K does, although both would be top contenders for best MS OS ever, Right behind Win98SE and DOS 6.2 (Vista need not apply).

                Kevin
                Agreed. Vista is only on beta rigs here because of its performance 'issues'.

                Gawd, I really do wish the video s/w companies would port to Linux. Their editors would probably run 25% faster just because of the reduction in bloat
                Dr. Mordrid
                ----------------------------
                An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wkulecz View Post
                  That, and the Fisher-Price look.

                  In what way is XP "better" than Windows 2000? Always seems slower to me on the same hardware as W2K. I've been working with both since each was released and still much prefer W2K.

                  On any dual boot XP W2K systems I've set up I quickly quit booting into XP except when I need to evaluate if an issue with the software I write might be an XP vs W2K issue. I develop on W2K, the XP issues that arise have so far always been "policy editor" issues in the way others setup their systems and are thus out of my control, although I usually can find a work around.

                  I predicted if XP and activation were accepted, the next version would be far more invasive. Vista proves I was correct.

                  So far none of my code has had issues running on Vista, but that of our partners sure has.

                  --wally.


                  Wally I don't want to get into a which is better for you discussion but I can tell you why XP is better for me. First of with all of my software works flawlessly on XP and since the release of IE7 I have been running with no virus software and no problems. The updates really have worked for me not only for security but for bug fixes as well. In addition networking has been much easier and more reliable with XP for me as compared to 2000.

                  Now I have not used 2000 in quite a few years but I remember a much better computing experience in moving to XP. I actually like the GUI of XP.

                  As I said this is just my experience I won't try to convince anyone that it's better. It's just better for me.
                  - Mark

                  Core 2 Duo E6400 o/c 3.2GHz - Asus P5B Deluxe - 2048MB Corsair Twinx 6400C4 - ATI AIW X1900 - Seagate 7200.10 SATA 320GB primary - Western Digital SE16 SATA 320GB secondary - Samsung SATA Lightscribe DVD/CDRW- Midiland 4100 Speakers - Presonus Firepod - Dell FP2001 20" LCD - Windows XP Home

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I've taken the plunge and bought a Mac mini with Intel Core 2 Duo processor... the low-cost 1.83GHz model:

                    The new, smaller Mac mini with the M4 or M4 Pro chip. Built for Apple Intelligence. Now with front and back ports. And the first carbon neutral Mac.


                    I continue to be amazed by the *tiny* form factor.

                    Also got APPLE Final Cut Express 4 with AVCHD high definition support:



                    Of course, iDVD '08 and iMovie '08 come with the computer:

                    The most powerful Mac laptops and desktops ever. Supercharged by Apple silicon. MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro.


                    And -- since a family member bought the multi-license iWork '08...

                    Pages, Numbers, and Keynote let you collaborate on documents, spreadsheets, and presentations from Mac, iPad, or iPhone – even on a PC.


                    ...I have that, too.

                    Thanks, Corel, for encouraging me to migrate to the APPLE Macintosh platform by virtue of your decision to drop support for Ulead MediaStudio Pro on Windows!



                    Jerry Jones

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If you're not a systems administrator you wouldn't understand just what a good OS XP really is: it is by no means perfect, but it is a quantum leap past Windows 2000 in terms of reporting and remote manangement
                      They are supposed to be "personal computers". What's best for a big company vs. what is best for me are two very different things.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I love my new Apple Macintosh mini.

                        Easy.

                        Small.

                        Simple.

                        ...yet...

                        Powerful.

                        Efficient.

                        Pleasant.



                        My setup is really sleek-looking, too.

                        Final Cut Express 4?

                        I love it; I love it; I love it.

                        iMovie '08?

                        Just plain cool.

                        I stuck my Panasonic SDR-S10 memory card into a tiny USB 2.0 card reader, which I plugged into my Macintosh mini's USB 2.0 port.

                        Apple iMovie '08 recognized the card immediately and imported the standard definition MPEG-2 file successfully -- without a glitch.

                        Scrubbing is amazingly responsive with this new iMovie '08 interface design.

                        Final Cut Express 4 reads file properties beautifully.

                        The APPLE INTERMEDIATE CODEC allows for flawless HD editing.

                        So far... I'm loving it.

                        But I'm still doing tests.

                        What surprises me so far is that it appears iMovie '08 can handle standard definition MPEG-2 natively; there's no conversion to an intermediate codec so now I need to test the rendering to see if there's "smart" rendering and to see if it actually works without tiny distortions at edit points (as is the case on the Windows platform MainConcept-powered software).

                        Jerry Jones

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Other things I'm noticing so far...

                          1. Much faster Apple OS X (Leopard 10.5) boot times;
                          2. Much easier program installation;
                          3. Apple OS X just kicks Windows to the curb on installation ease;
                          4. Apple OS X *feels* more stable;
                          5. Apple OS X's *organization* seems far more intuitive;
                          6. Apple OS X's *appearance* on the desktop looks far better.



                          Jerry Jones

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Apple Final Cut Express 4 follows some of the same paradigms familiar to users of Corel's Ulead MediaStudio Pro 8...

                            1. Dual windows;
                            2. Similar timelines;
                            3. Similar media libraries.

                            But the interface looks much more sleek and polished.

                            The function so far seems flawless, too.

                            Will keep testing.



                            Jerry Jones

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The tests pretty much confirm what I already experienced when I borrowed the Macs of certain family members for testing.



                              I also checked my system profiler and was very pleased to see that my mini features a Hitachi (not Seagate) hard disk.

                              I don't think I'm going to miss Microsoft Windows video editing.

                              Jerry Jones

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X