Here is a preview:
Memory controller on die, L3 cache, new microarchitecture, hyperthreading...
At equal clockspeeds to current quads (Penryn, which is faster than Conroe), Nehalem is showing 30% to 40% faster with media encoding. I can't wait to see how this monster does with my NLE.
Jeez, Intel has been promoting their "tick tock" plan for CPU's for a few years now but they are actually coming through with it. "Tick" is a die shrink, "Tock" is a new microarchitecture. Nahalem is built on the same 45nm process as Penryn so it is the "Tock." "Tick" will be Nahalem shrunk to 32nm.
This website, which in my experience is very reputable is predicting a 3.2GHz Nahalem system will be as fast as the Skulltrail system they tested, that system consists of TWO 3.2GHz Penryn quads.
- Mark
Memory controller on die, L3 cache, new microarchitecture, hyperthreading...
At equal clockspeeds to current quads (Penryn, which is faster than Conroe), Nehalem is showing 30% to 40% faster with media encoding. I can't wait to see how this monster does with my NLE.
Jeez, Intel has been promoting their "tick tock" plan for CPU's for a few years now but they are actually coming through with it. "Tick" is a die shrink, "Tock" is a new microarchitecture. Nahalem is built on the same 45nm process as Penryn so it is the "Tock." "Tick" will be Nahalem shrunk to 32nm.
This website, which in my experience is very reputable is predicting a 3.2GHz Nahalem system will be as fast as the Skulltrail system they tested, that system consists of TWO 3.2GHz Penryn quads.
- Mark
Comment