I haven´t used it before with my A7V because I didn´t need it, fsb overclocking would do it.
Now with my new A7V133, it´s really nice to run the TB 900 at 1ghz (7*144, 1.75v). The chip itself is a dog to overclock, I can´t get it stable at 1066 even at 1.85v.
Everything works just fine, high fsb and memory bandwidth/latency are the way to go, I´m scoring higher values in 2dmark2001 (2164) than TB 1200/100, for instance.
But how about the longevity of the graphite traces? I´ve seen both versions floating around: that you have to redo the traces once in a while (mostly when you try to turn on the pc and it doesn´t boot) and that the former situation is an "urban legend" and the traces last forever (at least if you´re not reseating/changing heatsinks twice a week)
What are your experiences?
Now with my new A7V133, it´s really nice to run the TB 900 at 1ghz (7*144, 1.75v). The chip itself is a dog to overclock, I can´t get it stable at 1066 even at 1.85v.
Everything works just fine, high fsb and memory bandwidth/latency are the way to go, I´m scoring higher values in 2dmark2001 (2164) than TB 1200/100, for instance.
But how about the longevity of the graphite traces? I´ve seen both versions floating around: that you have to redo the traces once in a while (mostly when you try to turn on the pc and it doesn´t boot) and that the former situation is an "urban legend" and the traces last forever (at least if you´re not reseating/changing heatsinks twice a week)
What are your experiences?
Comment