How can you be so pigheaded?
You've got to be kidding me. The VIA chips are FLAWED. They don't perform as they should, and cause data corruption.
The motherboard mfrs. DID follow VIA's guidelines, that's why they ALL had data corruption issues. Name me one that doesn't (before they incorporated the work around into their BIOS).
And Breese's program adds some latency to the transactions. It's a common work-around, especially in chip design: if it doesn't work at XX speed, slow it down. The chip wasn't meant to run this slowly. How, pray tell, does this prove that it isn't a chipset problem?
The only way that Epox "hurled stability overboard" was by choosing to make a motherboard around a VIA chipset solution.
BTW, not all situations demand a 300W supply. There are plenty of AMD boxes out there that work as they should with a good 250 or 235W.
And one little known fact is that VIA has been introducing different versions of their chipset onto the market, without changing version numbers or notifying people. It's made things tough for the Linux guys writing GPL drivers. But, if VIA were going to do stuff like this, why can't they at least slip in a 686B that WORKS?
You've got to be kidding me. The VIA chips are FLAWED. They don't perform as they should, and cause data corruption.
The motherboard mfrs. DID follow VIA's guidelines, that's why they ALL had data corruption issues. Name me one that doesn't (before they incorporated the work around into their BIOS).
And Breese's program adds some latency to the transactions. It's a common work-around, especially in chip design: if it doesn't work at XX speed, slow it down. The chip wasn't meant to run this slowly. How, pray tell, does this prove that it isn't a chipset problem?
The only way that Epox "hurled stability overboard" was by choosing to make a motherboard around a VIA chipset solution.
BTW, not all situations demand a 300W supply. There are plenty of AMD boxes out there that work as they should with a good 250 or 235W.
And one little known fact is that VIA has been introducing different versions of their chipset onto the market, without changing version numbers or notifying people. It's made things tough for the Linux guys writing GPL drivers. But, if VIA were going to do stuff like this, why can't they at least slip in a 686B that WORKS?
Comment