If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't know if you read the whole review, but SR said that this extra cache gives the same performance they calculate a 10k drive to give.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Just as a warning....I've had tons of Western Digital Hard Drives go bad on me. Only saving grace was that when they did start to go it wasn't to the point that I couldn't get the important data off them and their return/replacement policy is second to none! When I was working for a small Networking company, our system builder used nothing but WD drives and I remember at one point in time I had over a half dozen of them on my desk from a 2 month period of time. I would still suggest them though
Scott
Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?
I've heard those 10000 RPM drives (at least the early ones) shook like crazy and got really hot. Wonder if they will eventually come with fans/heatsinks preattached
With memory prices like these days, I do wonder why HDD's don't have realy large caches....
like 32 or 64....
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Comment