Mushkin, Corsair or Crucial?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which DDR Memory?
Collapse
X
-
Unless the world turns upside down, I will always use Crucial. It works. Damn well. I've never had Crucial sticks disagree with each other, and they have worked in every system I've blessed them with. They've never gone through the "AMD specific" crap. The one time I got a bad DIMM from Crucial, It took the tech all of 2 minutes to set up the cross-ship, and I sent the bad stick back USPS, costing me a total of about $1.60.Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
-
I use a stick of 256MB Crusial DDR2100+ in my Abit KG7-Raid.
It works like a charm at the Turbo setting. There is an Ultra settings which tries to set 1-1-1 latency but that will only work on Corsair DDR-RAM (Think I read that on HardOCP).
I guess Corsair is the best available, but also very expensive and can't be bought retail in Denmark...
Regards,
JakeWho is General Failiure and why is he reading my drive?
----------------------
Powercolor Radeon 9700np, Asus A7N8X mobo bios ver. 1007UBER, AthlonXP2800+@3200+ (200 Mhz fsb, 2.2 Ghz) on TT Silent Storm, 2*256Mb Kingston HyperX PC3500 DDR-RAM, 19" Samsung 959NF monitor, Pioneer A04 DVD-RW, Two WD800 80 GB HDD's, IBM Deskstar 40 GB
Comment
-
I voted Mushkin at this point for two reasons:
1. Almost always wins in benchmarks
2. Best customer service.
They are a tad more expensive but it is just about worth it when comparing everything. Admittedly, I have never used Corsair though. Haven't had any problems with crucial memory I have and I am mixing Mushkin/Crucial right now.
DaveLadies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
Comment
Comment