If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by thop hmm 6xFSAA. i want to see the 3dmark scores!
The R200 could already do 6xFSAA, it looked great, but it was unplayable for the most games if you used higher resolutions than 640x480, even with the "performance" setting.
I am wondering if they have improved Smoothvision, ATIs FSAA has always been behind nVidias performance wise, ATI offered better quality though.
Specs:
MSI 745 Ultra :: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ :: 1024 MB PC-266 DDR-RAM :: HIS Radeon 9700 (Catalyst 3.1) :: Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 :: Pioneer DVD-106S :: Western Digital WD800BB :: IBM IC35L040AVVN07
Isn't anybody going to bitch about the size of the fan? Oh, wait, it's not a Parhelia, so that's okay.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Overall I don't understand why they keep putting small, just about adequate fans on cards. If you put a large fan, the chip runs cooler, less people will damage their cards by trying to exchange the fan into something more exotic, and a larger fan is more silent as well. The cost can't be that much bigger, can it?
Yep,it's got to fit in the slot. Also, bigger fans would require pulling more power from the socket.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment