Tweet
Trident XP4-boy, did they ever blow it
Read'em and weep, it seems that Trident managed to get GeForce2 performance levels with their new baby...now that's an achievement!
-
Read'em and weep, it seems that Trident managed to get GeForce2 performance levels with their new baby...now that's an achievement!
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. -
I knew it wasn't gonna be great, but not this bad! -
A "DX9" card doing vertex shaders on the cpu is deceiving to say the least.Comment
-
Classic case of marketing not knowing what they're talking about. Build it up too much and then end up with egg on there face or this case more of an omlet.Comment
-
Seems I was right in 96' when i desided that Trident sucks and got myself a Matrox Mystique (the first one
)
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
wasn´t this card supposed to be for laptops?
maybe the horrible performance means that it doesn´t use as much power as the competition, thus improving batteri-life.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
Maybe, but the competition is stuff like ATI's 9000 Mobility. Unlikely to win there either.Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.Comment
-
But if it will be cheaper to implement than a Radeon 9000 mobility or GF4MX2go it could still get a share of the market..._____________________________
BOINC statsComment
-
Hmm, compare to this though: http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1681&p=6
I also wonder why they tested ONLY in 1600x1200. It might just be horribly inefficient at that particular res, or something. Flawed review or flawed card? I'd say both, but we will see
-Slougi
Comment
-
Is there actualy any laptop's that use that rez? (on its internal TFT)If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
-
I have heard of laptops that could do 1400*1050.Originally posted by Technoid
Is there actualy any laptop's that use that rez? (on its internal TFT)
but I think most laptops runs at 1024*768 or 1280*1024, so it would make more sense to benchmark it at these resolutions.
edit: GOC I stand corrected
This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.Comment
-
@TDB
Of course, we mustn't forget the sweetest of them all... Also has UXGA 15.1" screen...
It's just to damn expensive!
_____________________________
BOINC statsComment
-
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
Yep, it's a bit small but very impressive... Not that I would strain my eyes to use that res... Would be much happier with 1280x1024 res tops on 15" screen..._____________________________
BOINC statsComment
Comment