Tweet
Worked fine under win2k errors at 100% under xp but Xp loaded okay afterwards.
-
-
Yes, I had to run the installer twice, worked fine the second time.
This on XP.
rubankComment
-
I think we've found the reason why it's been pulled.
Comment
-
You can find the full version here instead of the web installer.Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSIComment
-
ATI just released Catalyst 3.0 to go with DX9: http://www.ati.com/products/pc/catalyst/dx9demos.htmlComment
-
31 megs thats just daft. Suppose the next version will be 124mb's.Comment
-
They are following in creatives footprints
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
Ballcocks the suspend and resume download manager failed.
At least the web installer is now backup. When I'm back at work I'll have to burn the full download to CD.Comment
-
The new ATI drivers want me to update the drivers for the DV side of my AIW. The only drivers that i can find are based on the older catalyst 2 driver set.The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England
Comment
-
DX9 End User
Thanks for the dist pack link.
One question though. When is DX9 supposed to be officially released?ECS K7S5A Pro, Athlon XP 2100+, 512 Megs PC-3200 CAS2.5, HIS Radeon 9550/VIVO 256Meg DDR
Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe C Mobile Athlon 2500+ @ 2.2GHz, 1GB PC-3200 CAS2.5, Hauppauge MCE 150, Nvidia 6600 256DDR
Asus A8R32 MVP, Sempron 1600+ @ 2.23GHz, 1 Gig DDR2 RAM, ATI 1900GTComment
-
It IS officially released...Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
The DX9 installer is back on the M$ DirectX front page:
NOTE to WinXP Users: You MUST have Cryptographic Services ENABLED to install DX 9.0.
JammrockLast edited by Jammrock; 21 December 2002, 13:24.“Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get outâ€
–The Light Fantastic, Terry PratchettComment
-
DX9
i too had to run the installer twice.
after the first install i tried to run dxdiag...i got the BSOD. after the system came back up i ran the installer again...no problems. all functions tested without a hitch.
ccComment
-
Havent' installed it yet, will do when Matrox releases there Directx 9.0 drivers.Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSIComment
-
Installing DX9 with DX8.1 graphic drivers should not hurt, in fact it should improve the overall performance.
DX is not only 3D it is sound, input, peripherials ... so you'll benefit from all the optimizations and new hardware supported in 9.0.
You (we) will only need a Matrox DX9 compatible drivers when games/apps demand DX9 specific features which in the next months is very unlikely.<font face="verdana, arial, helvetica" size="1" >epox 8RDA+ running an Athlon XP 1600+ @ 1.7Ghz with 2x256mb Crucial PC2700, an Adaptec 1200A IDE-Raid with 2x WD 7200rpm 40Gb striped + a 120Gb and a 20Gb Seagate, 2x 17" LG Flatron 775FT, a Cordless Logitech Trackman wheel and a <b>banding enhanced</b> Matrox Parhelia 128 retail shining thru a Koolance PC601-Blue case window<br>and for God's sake pay my <a href="http://www.drslump.biz">site</a> a visit!</font>Comment
Comment