Tweet
Originally posted by Paddy [MU]
Anyone got the new nature test to run?
What's it like?
Anyone got the new nature test to run?
What's it like?
-
It looks fantastic compared to the other nature tests I have seen! (codecreatures, 3dmark2001) -
Are you meant to get any sound when the sound test is running?Comment
-
Yes.Comment
-
mine bombs out at the sound test.The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England
Comment
-
The test runs, but it's silent. Does it matter that my speakers are connected via the Live's digital output only?Comment
-
Same here, except I have a Live! Value and therefore use the analog output. So it seems that the problem lies somewhere else.The test runs, but it's silent. Does it matter that my speakers are connected via the Live's digital output only?Comment
-
In my case (Audigy+analog speakers), the first sound test cannot be heard, the other 2 are fine....All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.Comment
-
Oh come on the first sound test is "no sound".P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
No... thats because Detonator can't run GT4 yet, as soon as it can, the performance would be closer. 3DMark03 is still quite dependent on CPU, but not as much as 3DMark2001.Originally posted by SteveC
Bit silly now though that a 1Gig CPU with a 9700 Radeon is twice the performance of a 3Gig CPU with a GF4... this can't be used as a system comparison any more. It can only be used to compare raw graphics performance, can't it? It's no longer a System 3D performance test, but I can't decide if it's better now that it's a real 3D graphics card test.P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
Oops, I'll look at the fine print next time ....Originally posted by WyWyWyWy
Oh come on the first sound test is "no sound".All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.Comment
-
Novdid: Screenshots!!!
no matrox, no matroxusers.Comment
-
yup, i wanna see the nature demo, and I am not prepared to spend £400 to do it!The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing EnglandComment
-
1286marks here
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."Comment
-
1671 with a XP1600+@1800+ and a GF4 @ 300/626.
Don´t really know, but this thing has a unpolished, unfinished feeling about it. 3dmark2000 had prettier scenes than game 1. Game 2 and 3 also run much slower than expected. That doom3 alpha leak looks better and run faster, and this says preety much about how unoptimized 3dmark code is.
That pixel shader 1.4 -> 1.1 fallback is also nonsense, why not 1.3?Comment
-
You should look at the feedback they have gotten in their own forum!
According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless..
.Comment
Comment