3DMark 2003

[fleabus2]

"WyWyWyWy
MURCer

http://216.240.159.13/Public%20Folder/3DMark03.exe

this one is okay.
the german server kind of died....

Thanks for the link Wy,

334bB/sec or 155 KB/Sec
176MB in ~12minutes
Sympatico Ultra

Nice!

[Nuno]

Ok, here´s my compare link http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=61212

[The PIT]

Downloaded this and left my usb 5 in 1 card reader at work. Silly bugger.

[Novdid]

Originally posted by WyWyWyWy
No... thats because Detonator can't run GT4 yet, as soon as it can, the performance would be closer. 3DMark03 is still quite dependent on CPU, but not as much as 3DMark2001.

No detonator in the world can make the GF4 run the nature scene, it's a PS2.0 test.

[SteveC]

Does the Demo work for anyone on the Parhelia? I just get the music plus a static picture of a crashed plane....

[Liquid Snake]

145 3DMarks!

[Novdid]

OK thop, here's a pic!

[Novdid]

Here's another one.

The water is far more convincing than before.

[WyWyWyWy]

Originally posted by Novdid
No detonator in the world can make the GF4 run the nature scene, it's a PS2.0 test.

Sorry I meant to say "GeForce" instead of "Detonator".

[thop]

DAMN that looks nice more pics! btw. on what system is that?

[Novdid]

The pics are taken with a Radeon 9700Pro, 4xAA and 16xAniso.

Here's another one:

[Novdid]

And another:

[thop]

ah thats why the frames are so low. how are they 0xAA and 4xAN? looks beautiful

[Novdid]

Yes, the frames are very low and it stutters like mad. But just wait, a couple of driver revisions in the future should increase those fps readings by a healthy amount!

[alekz]

HardOCP seem to be bashing 3DMark03 and say that it won't be used in their tests:

http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDI4