If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
downloaded it, tested it....
Result: not a slightest bit faster than "fatboy Mozilla"
conclusion: I'll continue to use old mozilla untill they are a bit more "done" with it
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
I rechecked and OMG: phoenix is whopping 1 second faster
Big deal
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Faster at what? It loads a hella lot faster on my system, and it sure as heck renders faster than IE does. It does appear that the memroy footprint has been increased though, thats kinda irritating.
Oh well, I still prefer it to any other browser out there. It's also nice that they finally added an option to outright disable password saving and form autocompletion.
Your machine is either unbelievably slow or totally f*cked up...
Phoenix is quite a bit faster for most everything than Mozilla.
I do have Mozilla installed together with Phoenix, but only because of it's email client. And with the release of the seperate Thunderbird email client I guess I won't have to anymore in the future.
Or maybe Technoid system is too fast that there is not much difference in which case only people with slower machines benefit from the newer code?
Life is a bed of roses. Everyone else sees the roses, you are the one being gored by the thorns.
AMD PhenomII555@B55(Quadcore-3.2GHz) Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 Kingston 1x2GB Generic 8400GS512MB WD1.5TB LGMulti-Drive Dell2407WFP
***Matrox G400DH 32MB still chugging along happily in my other pc***
I doubt it. If Mozilla is only a fraction slower than Firebird, something's fishy.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
okay, let me clarify:
Mozilla took 4 sec to start.
Phoenix took 3 seconds to start.
(and that is so small that it can easily become the same after a defrag)
pages renders/loads exactly the same.
I suspect that the reason that Phoenix loads faster for some is that it requires less memory (less than half of Moz )
BUT: i have 1024MB memory!!
That's probably why it don't seem to load any faster on mine
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Originally posted by Technoid okay, let me clarify:
Mozilla took 4 sec to start.
Phoenix took 3 seconds to start.
(and that is so small that it can easily become the same after a defrag)
pages renders/loads exactly the same.
...
hmm ... I wouldn't exactly consider a speedup of 33% as small ...
Besides that: w00t !!!
thanx for the headup, Wombat !
Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...
Comment