Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nvidia IQ and destroyed for speed
Collapse
X
-
Funny I thought Nvidea and High IQ was a conflict of terms.
The images do look a bit orrid don't they.
-
Heh, I had to link it at HardForums. Check it out if you want.System Specs:
Gigabyte 8INXP - Pentium 4 2.8@3.4 - 1GB Corsair 3200 XMS - Enermax 550W PSU - 2 80GB WDs 8MB cache in RAID 0 array - 36GB Seagate 15.3K SCSI boot drive - ATI AIW 9700 - M-Audio Revolution - 16x Pioneer DVD slot load - Lite-On 48x24x48x CD-RW - Logitech MX700 - Koolance PC2-601BW case - Cambridge MegaWorks 550s - Mitsubishi 2070SB 22" CRT
Our Father, who 0wnz heaven, j00 r0ck!
May all 0ur base someday be belong to you!
Give us this day our warez, mp3z, and pr0n through a phat pipe.
And cut us some slack when we act like n00b lamerz,
just as we teach n00bz when they act lame on us.
For j00 0wn r00t on all our b0x3s 4ever and ever, 4m3n.
Comment
-
Now that must be a tricky situation for NVidia! No matter what they do now, there will always be some people complaining about their decisions.
If they decide to improve the image quality, it will not come without the cost in gaming performance and the gamers are their main customers after all...
Comment
-
So what's new about this? nVidia kept lowering IQ in the last drivers to disguise the lower speed of their cards.
Those shots only show the (in such selected cases) drastic effects of the lowered rendering performance the nVidia drivers force on DX9 software, but don't forget about their also reduced LOD and Texture detail settings they used even before this.
The thing that's even worse than nVidias "approach" to their performance problem is, that nearly none of the reviewers mentions this
(tells you how to rate those "reviewers" - a bunch of paid lying bastards...)
Comment
-
tells you how to rate those "reviewers" - a bunch of paid lying bastards..
Interesting read here:
Hati
Comment
Comment