This just gets better...
david m Asked 2003/8/2 10:14
Re: Response CS000136720 As per your suggested fix to use a faster processor, I have just spent £250 upgrading my machine to an Athlon XP2400+ with 256 Mb DDR memory and a radeon 9000 pro video card. This has made no difference to the speed powerdvd 5.0 runs at, it still jerks along with 5 second pauses between frames, just as before. I append the diagnostic file and hope you can work out what the problem is.
Attach File : Cldma.log
jason_c Reply 2003/8/6 23:15
Please try to update your VGA card driver and you can try to update your Motherboard chipset driver from your motherboard company web site, after rebooting, you can update your VGA card driver for your OS (Win98SE) and tehn you can reinstall PowerDVD and start up PowerDVD 5 to play DVD to try (set your desktop resolution at 1024*768 16bit).
Previous message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
david m Asked 2003/7/18 12:46
Cry for help, not a complaint XP 4.0 ran like a dream, 5.0 plays half second clips with a 5 second delay... I bought the upgrade and installed it, I didn't uninstall 4.0 so presumably it went in over the top of 4?. Have I done something wrong? It's a 700 AMD chip running a Videlogic Kyro 2 Vivid! Xs graphics card that was perfectly happy running 4.0 XP in multi speaker mode. Dave
jason_c Reply 2003/7/22 20:40
Sorry, this is a performace issue, we suggest you to use more fast CPU to play PoweRDVD 5.0. Since we alrady enhance our video and audio enghine in PowerDVD 5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading between the lines, I've been trying to use it on a Princeton presentation monitor which has a max res of 800x600, The study computer runs at 1024x768 which would play it. Any bets as to whether it would work if I set the display to 1024x768 and sent it to the XGA projector (never got as far as turning the projector on before as it wouldn't play on the monitor)
So PowerDVD 5.0 may only be XGA and up, interesting...
Dave
david m Asked 2003/8/2 10:14
Re: Response CS000136720 As per your suggested fix to use a faster processor, I have just spent £250 upgrading my machine to an Athlon XP2400+ with 256 Mb DDR memory and a radeon 9000 pro video card. This has made no difference to the speed powerdvd 5.0 runs at, it still jerks along with 5 second pauses between frames, just as before. I append the diagnostic file and hope you can work out what the problem is.
Attach File : Cldma.log
jason_c Reply 2003/8/6 23:15
Please try to update your VGA card driver and you can try to update your Motherboard chipset driver from your motherboard company web site, after rebooting, you can update your VGA card driver for your OS (Win98SE) and tehn you can reinstall PowerDVD and start up PowerDVD 5 to play DVD to try (set your desktop resolution at 1024*768 16bit).
Previous message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
david m Asked 2003/7/18 12:46
Cry for help, not a complaint XP 4.0 ran like a dream, 5.0 plays half second clips with a 5 second delay... I bought the upgrade and installed it, I didn't uninstall 4.0 so presumably it went in over the top of 4?. Have I done something wrong? It's a 700 AMD chip running a Videlogic Kyro 2 Vivid! Xs graphics card that was perfectly happy running 4.0 XP in multi speaker mode. Dave
jason_c Reply 2003/7/22 20:40
Sorry, this is a performace issue, we suggest you to use more fast CPU to play PoweRDVD 5.0. Since we alrady enhance our video and audio enghine in PowerDVD 5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading between the lines, I've been trying to use it on a Princeton presentation monitor which has a max res of 800x600, The study computer runs at 1024x768 which would play it. Any bets as to whether it would work if I set the display to 1024x768 and sent it to the XGA projector (never got as far as turning the projector on before as it wouldn't play on the monitor)
So PowerDVD 5.0 may only be XGA and up, interesting...
Dave
Comment