Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this for real?.. Dual Radeon 9800!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is this for real?.. Dual Radeon 9800!

    If nothing else, they could be on to something..






    AGAIN, OUR good Italian friends have pointed to one of the most interesting pictures that people following computer graphics can view.
    The boys were able to take a picture of a unique card from Sapphire that is based on two Radeon 9800 PRO chips solution that would undoubtedly be the fastest card that exist. Apart from this, it would feature two DVI outs very useful stuff in Professional market and we wonder that it could easily have 512 MB or Ram 2x256 MHz to be precise since each chip can address 256 MB only.

    We learned that at 10 layer PCB it is simply impossible to make this card work and that this card will never come to market . We believe that even ATI was surprised with this since Sapphire used to follow what ATI does and in this case ATI never played with Radeon 9800 MAXX design.

    Still we believe that Sapphire could make this card work, even it would be freakily expensive – maybe in the $1000 range. ATI would need to write the drivers.

    Be sure that this card will never hit retail shelves but it is good to know that this is an option that can come if necessary in near future. Sapphire proved that it can do more then make ATI replicas and we believe that was the point of showing an incredibly impressive looking card that does not work. Anyway make sure to look at the LINQ, which is here.




    Quello che per molti utenti può sembrare un sogno è realtà al Computex di Taipei, anche se solo nella forma di prototipo non funzionante. Che la gamma MAXX di schede video ATI possa un giorno ritornare disponibile?
    We have enough youth - What we need is a fountain of smart!


    i7-920, 6GB DDR3-1600, HD4870X2, Dell 27" LCD

  • #2
    Real.
    no matrox, no matroxusers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Seen it on a few legit sites now and it does appear to be real.

      What is quite funny is that this has a thread on Rage3D and a good proportion of the members think that it is photoshop.

      Comment


      • #4
        IIRC Ati makes MAXX (dual core) Radeons since original Radeon for flight simulators and special orders (army...).

        Quite possible.

        Comment


        • #5
          I would probably buy one.

          Go nicely with my G200, the 9700Pro is having a hard time keeping up on the 2D side.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by dbdg
            What is quite funny is that this has a thread on Rage3D and a good proportion of the members think that it is photoshop.
            Everyone always thinks pics are photochopped. Just to prove my theory, I posted a REGULAR pic that I took years ago at a LIVE concert. Then i took a poll "chopped or real?". Most people said that the untouched pic was chopped.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by UtwigMU
              IIRC Ati makes MAXX (dual core) Radeons since original Radeon for flight simulators and special orders (army...).

              Quite possible.
              I work for a company supporting the US Army's various simulations and we have a contract for supporting a UAV simulator and they where creaming their pants at how well the Radeon 9800 256mb did on it. I believe they where running GeForce 3s on them prior to that...

              I haven't seen the simulation in person so I can't comment...though it makes me wonder how badly programed it is
              Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?

              Comment


              • #8
                Some Swiss company made dual and quad 9700 Pro cards for military simulators, I just can't find the link again

                Comment


                • #9
                  this one? http://www.es.com/products/image+gen...6000/index.asp
                  Last edited by TdB; 23 September 2003, 10:24.
                  This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    yup

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Missing my good old ATI Rage Fury Maxx ...
                      P IV 3,06 Ghz, GA-8ihxp i850e, 512 MB PC-1066 RDRam, Parhelia 128 mb 8x, 40 + 60 gb IBM 7200 upm/2048 kb HD, Samtron 96 P 19", black icemat, Razer Boomslang 2100 krz-2 + mousebungee, Videologic sonic fury, Creative Soundworks

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not the drivers I guess

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Admiral
                          Not the drivers I guess
                          Yeah, those too. Isn't the problem with the MAXX that its drivers were missing?
                          Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            yeah, ATI coulden't make it work in w2k, and had a lot of problems in the others to
                            If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

                            Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              We ventured into Sapphire’s media suite expecting a brief on its latest products and maybe a bit about the status of the RADEON 9100 IGP. Instead, we were presented with a graphics card eerily familiar to the Rage Fury MAXX of yesteryear. The unnamed board featured a pair of R350 graphics processors, presumably 256MB of memory, dual-DVI outputs, IEEE 1394, diagnostic LEDs, and a pair of RAGE Theater chips.

                              Unfortunately, Sapphire will never manufacture such a product, which would debut at $800 or so. Even the sample in Sapphire’s suite is a non-functional piece of work (is there any need for two Rage Theater chips, and where is the AGP bridge that ATI claims it would need to replicate its MAXX technology on a modern video card?).

                              There is, however, a market that regularly pays in excess of $2,000 for high-end cards and is able to utilize dual-DVI outputs. We’ll let you ruminate on the possibility of multi-chip solution in that space. After all, ATI’s FireGL lineup isn’t exactly competing with NVIDIA’s Quadro FX 3000 or 3DLabs’ Wildcat4 families and it could use a performance boost to vie for the high-end professional market.

                              What Sapphire would confirm for us is that it is developing a front panel extension to fit comfortably in a 3.5” drive bay. When it is released (Sapphire is giving us a December timeframe), the panel will offer DVI output, TV output through S-video and composite ports, a temperature readout, cooling fan speed, and a knob for adjusting the fan. The hardware will tie into Sapphire’s Redline utility, derived from Rage3D.com’s own tweaking application. Unfortunately, Sapphire’s current product lineup doesn’t support the expansion panel, which requires an onboard header for connectivity. Instead, you can expect the full range of RADEON cards to include the header around the same time as the panel is finalized.
                              According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X