If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Dell's flat panels are pretty decent, especially for the price. Just be aware that most 20's are running about 35ms response time at BEST.
- Gurm
The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwed
Originally posted by Gurm Dell's flat panels are pretty decent, especially for the price. Just be aware that most 20's are running about 35ms response time at BEST.
- Gurm
This Dell monitor uses the newer LG screen that sports a 16ms response time.
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
thx for the info though Dave! (tho i don't have that much money...)
hopefully LCDs will get even cheaper! I need a new monitor anyways. Just setup this Old 486 machine for interfacing a device I am building for comp engineering,,,,
Originally posted by Gurm Dell's flat panels are pretty decent, especially for the price. Just be aware that most 20's are running about 35ms response time at BEST.
- Gurm
Never had a problem with mine
Why is it called tourist season, if we can't shoot at them?
Are you sure? I wasn't aware that ANYONE was making an element larger than 17" with a sub-25ms response time.
- Gurm
The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwed
Dell's 2001FP is particularly interesting because it uses a 16ms panel that is not manufactured by AUO, the LG.Philips LM201U04. First of all, this panel dramatically increases the pixels on the screen from 1.3M to 1.9M. The second major accomplishment is that LG was able to achieve 16.7M color reproduction as well. Put in simpler terms, this means that each subpixel on the Dell 2001FP can reproduce all 256 shades where as each subpixel on the Hitachi CML174 could only do 64. Ergo the Dell 2001FP reproduces 24-bit color, while the Hitachi CML174 does 18-bit.
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
And here is a question...Can I connect a vcr or camcorder to the s-video or composite inputs and record the video? How does that work? Or can I only view the output of those devices?
Dave
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
I re-read the anand review for the billionth time and once again I am having second thoughts. It just seems like there is so much more room for improvement in the LCD arena. I feel like these improvements will come out soon and I will be wishing I had waited. Your thoughts?
Dave
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
wait. there are some problems with the lg panel - also used in the viewsonic 20" vp201 (?) & the 2080ux+.
I could post a link to a german tft-forum, but it won't be of much use to you.
mfg
wulfman
"Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
"Lobsters?"
"Really? I didn't know they did that."
"Oh yes, red means help!"
Comment