Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

VIA KT880 chipset

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Well here some reviews of SATA RAID controllers both integrated and offboard

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by rylan
      Kurt, I'm pretty sure my SATA raid1 setup is hardware controled through the 8327 southbridge. I have lower cpu utiliation with it than using the silicon image sata controler. I know windows has "software' raid, but I'm not sure how this can be software when the array is enabled before windows loads and I never set up additional raid support through windows.
      No, the software raid we are talking about is that the Raid Crad BIOS and the windows drivers perform all striping operations, rather then a dedicated controller on the card.

      This is not a problem for raid-0/1, but may be a problem if you want to do raid-5, and not pay a heavy CPU price.
      80% of people think I should be in a Mental Institute

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Gurm
        Ok, see this cracks me up. So I was poking around the reviews of the SiS748 chipset, and came across article after article saying things like "this chipset underperforms" and "this chipset isn't as fast as the VIA or nForce".

        But MULTIPLE hardware sites have reported that EVERY NFORCE CHIPSET currently in production can be crashed outright by loading it up with too many concurrent IDE transfers. That's right, set 20 large file copies going at once, and the chipset shits the bed and bluescreens!

        VIA apparently can be FORCED to corrupt data by doing much the same thing.

        That says to me that the chipset is DEFECTIVE.

        - Gurm
        Wow, that's pretty serious. Not that I don't believe you, but do you have any links?

        Comment


        • #19
          This makes me laugh...

          ยท V-Link 533MB/sec high bandwidth North/South Bridge interconnect

          Comment


          • #20
            Rugger,

            Erm, the reviews I read were, IIRC, at OCWorkbench and ... uhh, I forget where else. They weren't specific. They just said that without fail their "multiple concurrent file copy" benchmark stress test crashed VIA and nForce chipsets but not SiS.

            In my own experience, the nForce was super-buggy at moving data around. NOTHING else could be done with the machine while it was copying files.

            - Gurm
            The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

            I'm the least you could do
            If only life were as easy as you
            I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
            If only life were as easy as you
            I would still get screwed

            Comment

            Working...
            X