Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Electonic Engineers - Small (low) remote controlled electonic motor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I've thought about the car engines, but I have not found any yet where the motor and receiver would fit within 1.6cm of height...

    Had not thought about IR controller power, I assumed on 4x1.5V AAA batteries, it would last for quite a while..?!
    Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
    [...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by rylan
      Realistically a small servo or maybe stepper motor that is usable with reverse polarity is what you'd want, and I believe thats what most receivers with automatic volume knobs use. A standard motor will turn too much too quickly and be hard to control., and you'll need quite a bit of gearing to reduce the speed down enough. Other issue is for the IR microcontroler it'll need to be continuously powered, so your batteries won't last too long.
      he could simply lower the voltage of the motor...

      Comment


      • #18
        One of the cheapest ways to go... (most anything else would be costly and complex)

        "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

        "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

        Comment


        • #19
          Greebe, that's a diital volume controller, yes? So he'd need to put this either inbetween source and amp, or preamp and opamp - I don't know if that's what he wants (but the site looks interesting).

          AZ
          There's an Opera in my macbook.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Kurt
            he could simply lower the voltage of the motor...
            as a method of controlling speed... yes, but the torque of the motor pretty much dissapears then, not being able to turn anything other than itself.
            We have enough youth - What we need is a fountain of smart!


            i7-920, 6GB DDR3-1600, HD4870X2, Dell 27" LCD

            Comment


            • #21
              Shit, wish I knew someone who liked a challenge and developed and build to spec......

              Thanks guys, really, all of you have been very helpfull, but it just falls on infertile soil (me).....

              Apparantly there is so much one needs to know before one can even get started....it somehow reminds me of how I tried to explain asset-backed securities to a biologist........ and he did not even want to accomplish anything with the knowledge..... SHITE!
              Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
              [...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen

              Comment


              • #22
                You could go through using a motorized volume control... with it's added electrical noise, complication, et al or add the circuit I linked just in front of or after the attenuator potentiometer (volume control). Once the level is preset on the knob you are good to go with a lot less mess, frustration and expense.

                This way is more cut and paste than anything.
                "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                Comment


                • #23
                  My Yamaha amp has one of these motorized volume controls
                  I love it, it's so easy to just walk up and crank it up or down quickly by hand instead of using the remote.
                  especially when you can't find the remote
                  Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    especially when you can't find the remote
                    Biggest complaint I've have with the other half... for over a decade now it was... think I've finally gotten through in the last month.

                    My old Yamaha and a Technics also had one... but to implement is vastly more difficult.

                    First there is the motor, drive electronics, noise suppression, gearing and clutch to connect to the knob... then there is the remote issues to be tackled. If you were hardcore into all the 'geeky' items on this list and had vastly more money than my earlier suggestion then I'd say go for it.

                    But time and money spent would in most cases prove buying anew would be the better choice.
                    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                    "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Well - I found some small and cheap motors at <A href="http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?category=400&item=DCM-166&type=store">All Electronics</a>. It's still a job to get the remote control aspect working.

                      Good luck.

                      - Steve

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by spadnos
                        Well - I found some small and cheap motors at <A href="http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?category=400&item=DCM-166&type=store">All Electronics</a>. It's still a job to get the remote control aspect working.

                        Good luck.

                        - Steve
                        Too bad it's rpm rating is vastly too high for the need


                        Try this if you still wish to make it motorized.

                        more...

                        "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                        "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          "No load rating: 15,800 RPM @ 2.4 V"
                          a tad fast for controlling a volume control.. no?
                          find an old dot matrix printer and take out the stepper motor controlling the print head. it should either be free to find such, or really damn cheap
                          We have enough youth - What we need is a fountain of smart!


                          i7-920, 6GB DDR3-1600, HD4870X2, Dell 27" LCD

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            any old hard drive has stepper motors that control the heads.
                            these are generally very small and can be driven with a simple circuit.
                            just need to get past the remote control stuff.
                            those kits from velleman are actually very reasonably priced ($30-100)
                            Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              or even an old 5.25" floppy has some nice stepper motors
                              We have enough youth - What we need is a fountain of smart!


                              i7-920, 6GB DDR3-1600, HD4870X2, Dell 27" LCD

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                what about these



                                I will try to find the proper motorised volume control

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X