If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
If you haven't used either, I'd try starting with KDE, just because right now it's a good bit faster.
I run Gnome, but I started when Gnome was clearly a better choice. Nowadays, I kinda just leave it to personal preference.
Also, I would install both. They each have their star applications, and applications can still run under each other's desktop environment.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
I've only ever used KDE.
But Gnome is the default in Fedora (Red Hat)
Install both is a good idea.
I want to use the Windows XP boot loader, but it's easier to set up (and safer) if you have a Linux boot disk on hand.
I tried using mkbootdisk but the disk it made wouldn't boot.
chuck
I'd have to say I like Gnome better, in my personal experience with it on my Parhelia across three screens, it just feels a bit more responsive. Though a lot of that is dependant upon the application too. And I like the themes better, though Plastik for KDE looks quite nice, the Keramik was just too ugly to bare (well, the default colors of yellow I didn't care for, but the way Knoppix has it set up looks pretty nice).
Gnome is almost better for a newer user to computers, but I think KDE is a bit better for regular windows users.
What I mean by that statement is that Gnome has a very simplified and clean interface that is easy to get a hang of for new computer users. KDE is a bit more cluttered, but in that respect also looks/acts a lot more like windows does.
One thing I still think is much more refined in KDE though, is the filemanager. Konqueror rules for that. I'm still getting used to the spatial Nautilus in Gnome 2.6 though (I do like it... just need to get used to it.)
Leech
Wah! Wah!
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.
Originally posted by cjolley And where the heck did the create boot disk option go in the Fedora Core2 install?
Chuck
Welll in FC 1, during the installation, it would prompt me if I wanted to create a boot floppy. I said yes and the damn thing says sorry, but the image is too big for a floppy! Why does it ask then?!?!!! LOL See, FC 2, you don't even get asked to create a boot floppy during the install now.
Originally posted by RC Agent Welll in FC 1, during the installation, it would prompt me if I wanted to create a boot floppy. I said yes and the damn thing says sorry, but the image is too big for a floppy! Why does it ask then?!?!!! LOL See, FC 2, you don't even get asked to create a boot floppy during the install now.
I am going to use the ntldr to multiboot with.
So the first time I installed FC2 I just told it to forgo installing a boot loader.
It warned me that I needed to be sure to make a boot disk, and I said yes, I know.
Well, I went all the way through the install and was never given the option of creating a boot disk.
WTF!!!!
Instant orphaned install
If Microsoft had done something that stupid they never would have heard the end of it. (not that they haven't )
Comment