Didn't see this coming. This is turning into a killer year for computers. Next year should be spectacular.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SLI is back!
Collapse
X
-
I hope everyone adopts this. It may be a longshot, but I would really really really like dual P8x+ PCI-Express cards to keep Surround Gaming viable for the future.
Oh, I expected you'd have to get a special motherboard and all, but it's limited to Xeons?Last edited by bsdgeek; 27 June 2004, 22:14.
-
I hate that they're calling it SLI. It has almost nothing to do with the original implementation.Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment
-
True, it is closer to the Alienware design I believe. Plus, it only runs on dual PCI-E which apparently is only supported with Xeon CPUs. It's getting expensive. Pretty soon it'll cost me money to think about it.
DaveLadies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
Comment
-
I'm sure you'll be able to get dual 16x PCI-E other places soon enough. It's likely on the Xeon boards because servers have <I>real</I> use for the bandwidth (not just toys ).Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment
-
Except that one 6800 costs as much as a SLI setup did back then, consumes 50x the power, produces 10x the heat, 5x the noise and whatnot. Excellent step in the wrong direction.
I'd prefer a more efficient version instead of two freaking monsters but that's just me. But i can already see FPS whores creaming their pants.
It's a huge problem for Matrox though, now nV has quad-display.no matrox, no matroxusers.
Comment
-
Not to mention the 600 Watt PSU that will be required to run 2 NV 6800 cards...Go Bunny GO!
Titan:
MSI NEO2-FISR | Intel P4-3.0C | 1024MB Corsair TWINX1024 3200LLPT RAM | ATI AIW 9700 Pro | Dell P780 @ 1024x768x32 | Turtle Beach Santa Cruz | Sony DRU-500A DVD-R/-RW/+R/+RW | WDC 100GB [C:] | WDC 100GB [D:] | Logitech MX-700
Mini:
Shuttle SB51G XPC | Intel P4 2.4Ghz | Matrox G400MAX | 512 MB Crucial DDR333 RAM | CD-RW/DVD-ROM | Seagate 80GB [C:] | Logitech Cordless Elite Duo
Server:
Abit BE6-II | Intel PIII 450Mhz | Matrox Millennium II PCI | 256 MB Crucial PC133 RAM | WDC 6GB [C:] | WDC 200GB [E:] | WDC 160GB [F:] | WDC 250GB [G:]
Comment
-
the point with sli back then was that with 2 voodoo2´s you could run your games in 1024*768, that was a difference everbody could see and understand.
now, the only difference lies in the framerate, and the nv40 can already run every game REALLY fast at any setting, that is, faster than the refreshrate most people run their monitors at.
my point is: back then you could see the effect sli had in your games even without knowing much about computers, now you have to enable a framerate counter and disable v-sync, just to see if sli is enabled...
this is imo only needed if you use your computer for professional graphic-rendering...(the quadro-line will benefit from this, no doubt) or for triplehead gaming or really exotic resolutions.
Seriously do any of you expect a game this year (or the next). that ONE nv40 can´t run perfectly with everything to the max?This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.
Comment
Comment