Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Win XP SP2 RC out

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    3Com supports the feature (and supposedly Intel was either going to or has, but I am unable to find any more particulars on that) with some of their network cards.

    Outside of that, I do have to agree with Wombat on this. What purpose would it serve? it screws with a lot of the existing models for how things work in the networking world, and ties hardware independant functions to requiring a certain network card. not good karma.

    the only place it really winds up working out is in a corporate network where you can lock down the network card so that it can only talk to things it is supposed to at a "hardware" level. buuttt... even that has its limits...
    "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

    Comment


    • #17
      No external hardware required would be nice, although after checking Motorola's site I see they've got cable modems with a built-in firewall/router/802.11b combo now.

      #hellomoto | Discover our new unlocked Android phones from motorola and stay informed about our offers and promotions.

      Comment


      • #18
        I was at a Microsoft security seminar a few months back. Steve Balmer gave the closing keynote speech. He said that Microsoft expected firewall technology to be a big focus of future industry R&D efforts. He talked about developing AI based firewalls that would be able to see and stop attempts to compromise undiscovered security holes and he talked about extending the firewall model to the OS and application level. He said Microsoft is trying to develop a robust and effective method for users to be able to install their own apps without having to grant them enough security privileges that they could compromise a PC. He also said that the current model of “one time approval” wasn’t good enough and he wanted tech in the OS to monitor application activity in real-time to see if it started doing things it shouldn’t. Don’t get too excited, he was talking about R&D initiatives, not tech they were trying to implement in Longhorn.
        P.S. You've been Spanked!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Jon P. Inghram
          Anyone know if there's any reason why there are no NIC's with a built-in firewall?
          Doesn't NVidia's new 250Gb chipset have a built in firewall for their onboard LAN ? I guess the only purpose it would serve is to not have to worry about a software (OS) based or separate device (router) based firewall.
          Go Bunny GO!


          Titan:
          MSI NEO2-FISR | Intel P4-3.0C | 1024MB Corsair TWINX1024 3200LLPT RAM | ATI AIW 9700 Pro | Dell P780 @ 1024x768x32 | Turtle Beach Santa Cruz | Sony DRU-500A DVD-R/-RW/+R/+RW | WDC 100GB [C:] | WDC 100GB [D:] | Logitech MX-700

          Mini:
          Shuttle SB51G XPC | Intel P4 2.4Ghz | Matrox G400MAX | 512 MB Crucial DDR333 RAM | CD-RW/DVD-ROM | Seagate 80GB [C:] | Logitech Cordless Elite Duo

          Server:
          Abit BE6-II | Intel PIII 450Mhz | Matrox Millennium II PCI | 256 MB Crucial PC133 RAM | WDC 6GB [C:] | WDC 200GB [E:] | WDC 160GB [F:] | WDC 250GB [G:]

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by mmp121
            Doesn't NVidia's new 250Gb chipset have a built in firewall for their onboard LAN ? I guess the only purpose it would serve is to not have to worry about a software (OS) based or separate device (router) based firewall.
            Yep, http://www.nvidia.com/page/nf3.html

            Comment

            Working...
            X