Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

.09 AMD64 overclocks 45%!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Go AMD!

    Comment


    • #17
      Most P4s can get a 20% oc with stock cooling, even (especially) the prescotts, and the temp isnt going to raise much higher than it already is. I just dont see why they are basically stopping the rise dead at (below) 4ghz when they can do better than that. I'm not saying they can keeping rising and rising until they get to 5 or 6, but I KNOW they can do over 4 before stock cooling becomes an issue.
      Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
      Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

      Comment


      • #18
        increasing the clockspeed by 20% on a particular sample will also increase the heat by 20%, is it not? I would hardly call that 'the temp isnt going to raise much higher than it already is'.

        Look at the thermal guideline for their 3.6 GHz parts:


        115 Watt thermal guideline for a desktop part!!! I'd say that's enough indication to let all alarm bells ring when you have plans to scale it up to 4+ GHz speeds.
        Last edited by dZeus; 18 October 2004, 12:34.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dZeus
          increasing the clockspeed by 20% on a particular sample will also increase the heat by 20%, is it not? I would hardly call that 'the temp isnt going to raise much higher than it already is'.
          No, it's not. One of the reasons these things are so hot is that there's a lot of leakage - power that is just being dissipated, not doing work. This waste heat isn't going to change much with clock speed.
          Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

          Comment


          • #20
            alright, but raising clockspeed is surely going to affect the total amount of produced heat, and with the 3.6 at 115 Watt, that would not be a pleasant forecast for faster CPU speeds.

            Comment


            • #21
              Yeah its going to dissipate more heat because the transisters are switching faster.
              Whats happened with Intel's process is the majority of their power and therefore heat is from current leakage as mentioned, which is related to the voltage you run the processor at. In the past with larger feature size current leakage was a small fraction of power dissipation, so temps were closely related to clock speed and not so much voltage.

              Comment

              Working...
              X