If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Dual Opteron 2000 series (Rev F)
SLI Support
Two extra PCI-E x16 slots with x8 signalling
Two PCI-X
One PCI
6 SATA II ports with RAID 0,1,5,JBOD
8 SAS ports with RAID 0,1,5,JBOD
Up to 32GB RAM
Hot damn!
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
You can get eSATA via a $5 adapter plugged into one of the internal ports. A dedicated port would be nice, but it's really not that big of a deal.
That will also negate the need for 1394b. 3Gb/s is a little quicker than 800Mb/s. I have an eSATA HD enclosure, it's stunning.
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
Dual Opteron 2000 series (Rev F)
SLI Support
Two extra PCI-E x16 slots with x8 signalling
Two PCI-X
One PCI
6 SATA II ports with RAID 0,1,5,JBOD
8 SAS ports with RAID 0,1,5,JBOD
Up to 32GB RAM
Hot damn!
Well that depends on whether the new Opteron 2000 series are faster than the new XEON 5x00 series.
The final word isn't in yet, but they're rumored to be quite good competition for the woodcrest. I have a feeling that if you factor in $, performance, and power usage, the Opterons will maintain a very slight lead. The new Xeons use much less power, but the FB-DIMMs use a hell of a lot more, and that nearly balances out. Wait and see I guess.
SAS = Serial Attached SCSI. It's SCSI running over SATA cables. Very fancy.
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
@Elie: SAS is the SATA version of SCSI. SAS = Serial Attached SCSI. As implied it's designed for efficient RAID and data farms and the like, essentially eliminating the big fat SCSI cables and termination issues.
@agallag: I've always wanted to try eSTA. My dream HTPC would have a SSD for OS and whatnot and a 6 m xSATA cable going into a closet where I had a stand-alone eSATA RAID box for storing media. I suppose if you used eSATA most of IEEE 1394b's benefits go away, but I have a b enclosure so ... it would be nice, but if I could afford to outfit this board I could spring for an eSATA enclosure.
Jammrock
“Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get outâ€
–The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett
My eSATA enclosure was $45 canadian, so it definitely wouldn't be a factor. If you're going for a RAID enclosure, that would obviously increase the cost a fair bit. If you find one of those that's cost effective, let me know!
Also, you could always drop in a 1394b controller card if you need it.
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
My eSATA enclosure was $45 canadian, so it definitely wouldn't be a factor. If you're going for a RAID enclosure, that would obviously increase the cost a fair bit. If you find one of those that's cost effective, let me know!
Also, you could always drop in a 1394b controller card if you need it.
I have found barebone eSATA RAID enclosures for as low as $200 USD for 4 drives and drive multiplexing (meaning only a single SATA cable needed between enclosure and PC). 5-bay jobs jump to $400 USD. But a 5-bay with 5 x 320 GB HDDs (<$100 USD each) would run under a grand and give you 1.28 TB in a RAID 5 configuration, or 1.6 TB in a RAID 0. Not too shabby.
Or if you went with a 4-bay @ $200 + 4 x 320 GB in RAID 0 you could get 1.28 TB for roughly $600 USD.
Comment