Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alternative OS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    the single most important thing to do with ubuntu:

    INSTALL AUTOMATIX AS SOON AS YOUR INSTALLATION FINISHES!

    nothing more to say. adds mp3, dvd/css, nvidia/ATI drivers & more useful stuff, that can't be included in the regular distribution for legal reasons.

    mfg,
    wulfman
    "Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
    "Lobsters?"
    "Really? I didn't know they did that."
    "Oh yes, red means help!"

    Comment


    • #17
      Automatix? I have not heard of it. I'm familiar with EasyUbuntu, though. Can you compare them?
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

      Comment


      • #18
        same idea, as far as I can tell. automatix seems to be heavier on the apps-side, but you can customize what you want in the process.

        compare for yourself:





        mfg
        wulfman
        "Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
        "Lobsters?"
        "Really? I didn't know they did that."
        "Oh yes, red means help!"

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Wombat View Post
          One of the advantages of grub is that it can be changed on the fly, at boot time.
          the disadvantage is that it is grub. heh.

          never had issues booting linux with ntldr even under Windows NT 4.0. It's a bit of a pain in the ass for any machine where you update the kernel frequently, but for production machines it was always pretty painless.
          "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

          Comment


          • #20
            Thanks guys. I've got the unbuntu distro, and i'll pull the suse 10.2 dvd tonight. On aesthetics alone, which would you pick? You guys seem to all be leaning towards unbuntu
            The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England

            Comment


            • #21
              Aesthetically there's not much difference in reality. SUSE runs Gnome just as Ubuntu does (KDE is becoming less the default with each new release), just as they do KDE and any other Window and Theme manager (yep, there are differences).

              The differences come into play with how and where each distro places things. Ubuntu tends to be simpler in this regard, as SUSE comes packed with a lot of stuff.

              Personally I prefer SUSE with Gnome and a non-default theme. Gnome Look (www.gnome-look.org) is a great place to delve into the available themes. There's also KDE Look site as well. The only marginally confusing thing is determining which window manager you're running. The default for me in SUSE running Gnome was Metacity.
              “And, remember: there's no 'I' in 'irony'” ~ Merlin Mann

              Comment

              Working...
              X