Another one of those examples where technology crept up on me... Since about 4 months, it is possible to get fiber to the home at my place in Warsaw. Now, my ADSL subscription expires and it turns out that they have no more ADSL offers. Fiber is the only option, and 100 Mb is the minimum. Of course it means pulling a new cable (and of course I don't have a nice cabling system there, so there will be a cable along the wall), but I did not expect fiber to come so soon. I thought I would move to some VDSL solution before fiber.
It changes my cabling somewhat. Currently I have:
telephone line -> splitter/filter -> patch panel --in wall-> router --in wall-> switch -> patch panel --in wall-> everywhere
The reason the router is where it is, is as the printer is positioned there, and the printer is shared on the network. Now, if I want to keep using my own router, which I do, I will have
fiber -> provider-router -> patch panel --in wall-> router --in wall-> switch -> patch panel --in wall-> everywhere
The annoying thing here is the provider router: an extra device taking up space and using power. If I would go with an own router (e.g. Fritzbox), it would have to be where the fiber is, and that is not where the printer is, so I lose the printer share.
My switch is a smartswitch by DLink (DGS-1210), which has places for a fiber transceiver. I'm wondering if it is possible to do something with that: add a fiber transceiver, route it to a fixed port of the switch (it has that functionality!), then connect it via cables to my router (which as an ethernet wan port). Of course, a simple fiber-ethernet transceiver should also work but means an extra device.
For sure something to try in the future (still in Spain for one and a half years), but I still am shocked to see how FTTH just arrived so fast.
It changes my cabling somewhat. Currently I have:
telephone line -> splitter/filter -> patch panel --in wall-> router --in wall-> switch -> patch panel --in wall-> everywhere
The reason the router is where it is, is as the printer is positioned there, and the printer is shared on the network. Now, if I want to keep using my own router, which I do, I will have
fiber -> provider-router -> patch panel --in wall-> router --in wall-> switch -> patch panel --in wall-> everywhere
The annoying thing here is the provider router: an extra device taking up space and using power. If I would go with an own router (e.g. Fritzbox), it would have to be where the fiber is, and that is not where the printer is, so I lose the printer share.
My switch is a smartswitch by DLink (DGS-1210), which has places for a fiber transceiver. I'm wondering if it is possible to do something with that: add a fiber transceiver, route it to a fixed port of the switch (it has that functionality!), then connect it via cables to my router (which as an ethernet wan port). Of course, a simple fiber-ethernet transceiver should also work but means an extra device.
For sure something to try in the future (still in Spain for one and a half years), but I still am shocked to see how FTTH just arrived so fast.
Comment