I'm sure many of you have seen the furor caused by AMD stating the Socket A cpus are multiplier locked.
Tom's Hardware had shown that with the Asus A7v mobo that dip switches were included to over ride these settings,apparently this may no longer be possible.
Tom's hardware, as you may have already seen,has laid out all the little bridges present on the CPUS and which should be open or closed to achieve the desired mhz settings.
This bit of info has everyone drilling, cutting,and disfiguring their CPUS in every possible way.
As shown closing the bridge is no big deal,opening them is the problem!
At Anand's site he has a Fic mobo
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1277&p=1
which had the contact points for a similar type device as found on the Asus mobo.
He carefully soldered pins onto the contact points and voila,almost.
According to him the cpu would not overclock as it was multiplier locked!
My question after this long build up is:
If all the bridges were closed on the cpu,could multiplier manipulation then be executed from the jumpers as shown on the Fic mobo or the Asus mobo,and does this sound like a more logical approach,could a dip type switch be connected to the pins on the backside of the mobo(the ones responsible for the different multiplier settings or the traces on the mobo?
Beats drilling,sawing,etc.!if possible
Tom's Hardware had shown that with the Asus A7v mobo that dip switches were included to over ride these settings,apparently this may no longer be possible.
Tom's hardware, as you may have already seen,has laid out all the little bridges present on the CPUS and which should be open or closed to achieve the desired mhz settings.
This bit of info has everyone drilling, cutting,and disfiguring their CPUS in every possible way.
As shown closing the bridge is no big deal,opening them is the problem!
At Anand's site he has a Fic mobo
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1277&p=1
which had the contact points for a similar type device as found on the Asus mobo.
He carefully soldered pins onto the contact points and voila,almost.
According to him the cpu would not overclock as it was multiplier locked!
My question after this long build up is:
If all the bridges were closed on the cpu,could multiplier manipulation then be executed from the jumpers as shown on the Fic mobo or the Asus mobo,and does this sound like a more logical approach,could a dip type switch be connected to the pins on the backside of the mobo(the ones responsible for the different multiplier settings or the traces on the mobo?
Beats drilling,sawing,etc.!if possible
Comment