Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Low 3dmark at 862Mhz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Low 3dmark at 862Mhz

    When I run 3dmark2000, I get confusing result
    At 800Mhz, 3DMark Result:2980 3D marks
    CPU Speed:256 CPU 3D marks
    At 862Mhz, 3DMark Result:2800 3D marks
    CPU Speed:202 CPU 3D marks
    Why does the scores go down at higher freq.
    I change nothing except FSB.
    My system: W98se
    PIII800
    G400DH, not OC
    IBM 30G, 7200RPM
    ABIT BE6-II, HPT 370 controller
    PCI128 Sound Card
    Diamond Supra Max, Internal
    Logitech Wheel mouse
    IOMEGA CDRW 8432

  • #2
    That's very low, I get 3059 with a V3 and a Duron 800, that benchmark is biased towards the P3 so you should be getting much higher.

    My cpu rating is 219.

    Oh, there is a bug in the program that allows for people to report higher scores than they should be getting, so it might be related to that, so check with some other benchmark program if you suspect hardware problems.

    Comment


    • #3
      Perhaps something was still loaded in memory when ran the 2nd test. Have you run it again since?
      Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
      Weather nut and sad git.

      My Weather Page

      Comment


      • #4
        I have ran 3dMark numerous times to verify
        consistency and it gives the same each time.
        Changing the FSB higher should make the 3d scores go up, right.
        Very perplexing.

        HH

        Comment


        • #5
          I got an Athlon 1.1Ghz and an non o/c G400 MAX and i'm getting the following on 3dMark 2000:

          3367 3DMarks
          268 CPU 3D Marks

          And by the way get the upgrade for 3Dmarks 2000, its on version 1.1 now!
          Athlon Thunderbird 1.1Ghz@1.2~1.3+GHz Socket A 256Kb,Asus A7V dipswitches,GlobalWin FOP32-1 heatsink,GlobalWin 802 Advance ATX Case, 17" Sony Multiscan 200PST,384MB Crucial PC133 CAS=2,ATI Radeon 32Mb DDR,(Matrox Millenium G400 MAX 32MB 5ns SGRAM),IBM Deskstar 75GXP 15Gb UltraATA/100, Quantum Firebal EL 10.2Gb,Hewlett Packard DeskJet 970Cxi,Epson Perfection 1240U Scanner,Sound blaster Live!,Cambridge Soundworks 5.1,Creative PC-DVD 5X,CDR-RW Ricoh MP7040S@MP7060S(Tweaked from 4x--->6x with no problem),Adaptec SCSI 2920C,Diamond SupraExpress 56e PRO,Iomega Zip Drive.

          Comment


          • #6
            Not if it's making your HD drop down to PIO mode? I don't know, never ran this benchmark.
            Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

            Comment


            • #7
              Hitmann,

              I myself have several scores at 34xx that I have no idea where they came from, I certainly don't recall seeing them at the end of a benchmark run yet they are listed among my submissions on the madonion site. Don't take the results as being too meaningful.

              Comment


              • #8
                I wonder if your graphics card has dropped down to agp x1.
                Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                Weather nut and sad git.

                My Weather Page

                Comment


                • #9
                  never owned an abit board but isn't there a setting in bios called "depth of queue" or similiar which defaults at 2 but performance benchmarks rise dramatically if set to 8??

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    PCI List still shows x2 enabled.
                    Depth of queue is at 8 also.
                    Plan on upgrading to ATI RADEON DDR.
                    Can get one for 150$ USA after 50$ rebate.
                    Will do a direct compare after that.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I got the same thing (well, similar). My benchmarks hardly increased when I overclocked. It turned out that the 'auto' settings for ram timings and so on were changing as I increased the FSB. check the queue order depth, agp speed, cas latencies and so on.

                      ------------------
                      Cheers,
                      Steve

                      "Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X