Small OpenGl benchmark on Overdraw/Fill rate/T&L performance

[Nuno]

http://hem.passagen.se/emiper/3d.html

Very interesting. So who wants to bet that Kyro chips will excel on this bench?

BTW, here´s some G400 results:

G400 @ 150/200, Athlon 1 Ghz, win2k

Results:
--------

Overdraw/HSR:
-------------
Overdraw factor 3, back to front: 60.49 fps
Overdraw factor 3, front to back: 74.79 fps
Overdraw factor 3, random order: 68.28 fps

Overdraw factor 8, back to front: 23.94 fps
Overdraw factor 8, front to back: 32.69 fps
Overdraw factor 8, random order: 30.03 fps

Fillrate:
---------
Pixel fillrate: 200.82 MegaPixels / s
Texel fillrate: 240.22 MegaTexels / s

T&L/High polygon count static display list:
-------------------------------------------
Pure transform: 5060804 vertices / s
2 point lights: 1993576 vertices / s
8 point lights: 939192 vertices / s
2 directional lights: 3059514 vertices / s
8 directional lights: 2310632 vertices / s

High memory bandwidth load/texture cache efficiency:
----------------------------------------------------
One 1024x1024x32 texture: 149.03 fps
Four 1024x1024x32 textures: 153.46 fps

I think the G400 is still kicking (The funny part is that with a overdraw of 8, a Gforce MX doesn´t perform that much better than a G400)

[This message has been edited by Nuno (edited 05 May 2001).]

[CHHAS]

Just ran it on my Radeon SDR:

Results:
--------

Overdraw/HSR:
-------------
Overdraw factor 3, back to front: 100.17 fps
Overdraw factor 3, front to back: 123.72 fps
Overdraw factor 3, random order: 112.97 fps

Overdraw factor 8, back to front: 36.66 fps
Overdraw factor 8, front to back: 48.43 fps
Overdraw factor 8, random order: 44.94 fps

Fillrate:
---------
Pixel fillrate: 309.82 MegaPixels / s
Texel fillrate: 743.34 MegaTexels / s

T&L/High polygon count static display list:
-------------------------------------------
Pure transform: 7075557 vertices / s
2 point lights: 4926703 vertices / s
8 point lights: 4864951 vertices / s
2 directional lights: 4922924 vertices / s
8 directional lights: 4895765 vertices / s

High memory bandwidth load/texture cache efficiency:
----------------------------------------------------
One 1024x1024x32 texture: 209.18 fps
Four 1024x1024x32 textures: 189.46 fps

[Nuno]

Ooops. Actually I realized I should have post it in benchmark forum. Any of the mod´s would care to move it?

BTW, what CPU are you using, CHHAS?

[Joel]

I downloaded and tried to run it but it just kept showing this wall, I guess, that rocks back and forth and stretching as it rotates. Is that all it does and I'm just not letting it run long enough?

Joel

[Nuno]

It´ll take some time to finish, Joel. At the end it´ll exit, create and open a .txt file from wich CHHAS and I just copy and pasted the results.

It doesn´t have no fancy graphics - it repeats the same textures several times, just changing the amount of overdraw I guess.

[Jon P. Inghram]

G400 MAX, Celeron 533A@800
[edit]
Also, PDesk 6.51, Win98, 440BX chipset
[/edit]

Results:
--------

Overdraw/HSR:
-------------
Overdraw factor 3, back to front: 58.67 fps
Overdraw factor 3, front to back: 73.71 fps
Overdraw factor 3, random order: 66.80 fps

Overdraw factor 8, back to front: 23.21 fps
Overdraw factor 8, front to back: 32.41 fps
Overdraw factor 8, random order: 29.58 fps

Fillrate:
---------
Pixel fillrate: 201.23 MegaPixels / s
Texel fillrate: 248.76 MegaTexels / s

T&L/High polygon count static display list:
-------------------------------------------
Pure transform: 4487919 vertices / s
2 point lights: 1390151 vertices / s
8 point lights: 657267 vertices / s
2 directional lights: 2051385 vertices / s
8 directional lights: 1614193 vertices / s

High memory bandwidth load/texture cache efficiency:
----------------------------------------------------
One 1024x1024x32 texture: 137.25 fps
Four 1024x1024x32 textures: 145.90 fps

[This message has been edited by Jon P. Inghram (edited 05 May 2001).]

[Indiana]

RadeonDDR 64MB @200/200 on a Duron800@920:

Results:
--------

Overdraw/HSR:
-------------
Overdraw factor 3, back to front: 146.68 fps
Overdraw factor 3, front to back: 270.88 fps
Overdraw factor 3, random order: 199.58 fps

Overdraw factor 8, back to front: 55.32 fps
Overdraw factor 8, front to back: 140.09 fps
Overdraw factor 8, random order: 102.01 fps

Fillrate:
---------
Pixel fillrate: 395.98 MegaPixels / s
Texel fillrate: 1171.81 MegaTexels / s

T&L/High polygon count static display list:
-------------------------------------------
Pure transform: 9750098 vertices / s
2 point lights: 5771368 vertices / s
8 point lights: 5726784 vertices / s
2 directional lights: 5770890 vertices / s
8 directional lights: 5734098 vertices / s

High memory bandwidth load/texture cache efficiency:
----------------------------------------------------
One 1024x1024x32 texture: 371.57 fps
Four 1024x1024x32 textures: 328.00 fps

This is on Win2k, the results should be even higher in Win98SE.

EDIT: CHHAS: Are you sure you have HyperZ activated? Your Overdraw-results seem a bit low to me (even considering that you have the SDR).

[This message has been edited by Indiana (edited 05 May 2001).]

[CHHAS]

Nuno:

I'm running on a Duron 650@866 under Win98SE and Dx8.1b

Indiana:

The results seem low alright, I checked the Rage3D forum and it seems that the 7103 drivers I'm using are to blame, I'll try some earlier drivers and see if that changes the result.

[az]

Wasn't HyperZ deactivated on some SDR Radeon boards and was there not a registry hack to reactivate it?

AZ

[CHHAS]

Ahh, enabled HyperZ via the R3D tweaker, much better now

Results:
--------

Overdraw/HSR:
-------------
Overdraw factor 3, back to front: 103.07 fps
Overdraw factor 3, front to back: 210.57 fps
Overdraw factor 3, random order: 146.81 fps

Overdraw factor 8, back to front: 37.92 fps
Overdraw factor 8, front to back: 110.64 fps
Overdraw factor 8, random order: 75.39 fps

Fillrate:
---------
Pixel fillrate: 312.87 MegaPixels / s
Texel fillrate: 742.84 MegaTexels / s

T&L/High polygon count static display list:
-------------------------------------------
Pure transform: 6932202 vertices / s
2 point lights: 5089149 vertices / s
8 point lights: 5056151 vertices / s
2 directional lights: 5082503 vertices / s
8 directional lights: 5073978 vertices / s

High memory bandwidth load/texture cache efficiency:
----------------------------------------------------
One 1024x1024x32 texture: 199.99 fps
Four 1024x1024x32 textures: 180.10 fps

[CHHAS]

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Originally posted by az:
Wasn't HyperZ deactivated on some SDR Radeon boards and was there not a registry hack to reactivate it?

AZ</font>

That's the Radeon LE boards

[az]

Ah OK, thx

AZ

[Indiana]

But it sure does look better now that you have HyperZ enabled

[Nuno]

Ok, CHHAS, thanks, it was just to analyze better the T&L numbers.

Say, won´t you mind to drop by at http://pvr.gamestats.com/cgi-bin/iko...um=1&topic=112 to talk about kyro/Matrox 2d quality to a fellow Matrox user?

[Joel]

Hey CHHAS,

Where did you get DirectX 8.1b?

Joel