It looks like the G400 was made Athlon/K7

[carlmeister]

Check out this review:

http://www.fullon3d.com/hardware/reviews/0899/k7video/

We don't need no stinking 16 bit performance!!!

[ManojMahtani]

I am glad this was brought up, maybe tombman pay attention:



and click here to see the rest:
http://www.fullon3d.com/hardware/reviews/0899/k7video/

Remember these are vanilla G400 benchmarks.

Best Regards,

NotMM

[Joelg]

God I can't wait. I've already started saving my pennies.

Joel

[Maniac]

Yep the G400 is definitely heavily cpu dependant. The more bots I added in UT the slower the game play got. It still has room for optimizations I'm sure

[M Buuri]

It was made for Athlon baby, it was made for AMD.

B

[tish]

Muahahaaa!

that link ain't work'n

Damn when do you think they'll get to number EU-1239?
can'twaitcan'twaitcan'twaitcan'twaitcan'twaitcan't waitcan'twaitcan'twaitcan'twaitcan'twait.

------------------
It's nice to be important, but more important to be nice. - Scooter

[Chris H]

Yep, the Athlon definately sounds good, read a review yesterday, the 600MHz version scored 12,650CPU marks on 3d Mark 99 Max!

I've already started saving!

[Lucid]

Will there be Athlon if Intel buys AMD..

http://www.theregister.co.uk/990806-000003.html

[Joelg]

Why do you think Intel wants to buy AMD? AMD has slowly but surely over the past couple of been gaining market share from Intel and with the looks so far of the Athlon CPU it could be Intel's time to play second fiddle.

Joel

[This message has been edited by Joelg (edited 08-09-99).]

[Chris H]

Check out the Athlon review at www.tomshardware.com

[Jammrock]

AAAAAHH!!! HE SAID THE WORDS THAT THE MATROX FORUMS USERS CANNOT STAND TO HEAR!!!

What, tomshardware.com?

AH! He said it again..now I said it..ahh.

Jammrock

[Chris H]

LOL

Whats wrong with mentioning tomshardware?

[This message has been edited by Chris H (edited 08-09-99).]