We all know that Tom Pabst excels at impartiality, as demonstrated by the age old nVidia vs 3dfx thing that was going on a while back, but it would appear he has found a new butt plug in the form of his Athlon(s). I probably don't need to tell you that many don't appreciate his more often than not one sided or very poorly balanced writing style, but I can't help but feel he's beaten his own personal best (or worst) with his "Performance-showdown between Athlon and Pentium III" article.
I remember his remarks about the PIII when it first came out, and how he passed the chip off as being a half arsed effort by intel to compete with AMDs K6-3 chip (did anyone ever buy one of those things?). All of a sudden, his reviews change their angle. Right from the opening paragraph of his review, he refers to the PIII as a... hang on, he doesn't refer to it at all!?! What could be going on here I wonder.
Jeez Tom, maybe you should take a little more care to mention those un-achievable clock speeds to your readers a few more times next time.
He performs his usual array of out-dated CPU and system tests, and dazzles us with numbers (which I admit, do favour the Athlon) and charts. In one instance (the expedable demo) the PIII with it's SSE instructions comes a little closer to the Athlons levels. His response to this made me laugh, I mean really laugh, when this guy takes to something he really does push it all the way...
Tom, Tom, Tom, jumping to the defence of your pimp again hey? Surely sounds like it.
OK, sorry for boring you good Matrox folk. I have nothing against AMD, I own an AMD system, I just don't like it when people try to pass off personal opinions as a "review". I really need to stop reading his stuff, he really does have his head up his arse.
Dave K
------------------
Agent31™. All comments Copyright © 1999 Agent31. All rights reserved.
I remember his remarks about the PIII when it first came out, and how he passed the chip off as being a half arsed effort by intel to compete with AMDs K6-3 chip (did anyone ever buy one of those things?). All of a sudden, his reviews change their angle. Right from the opening paragraph of his review, he refers to the PIII as a... hang on, he doesn't refer to it at all!?! What could be going on here I wonder.
Although I might take the risk of boring you with even more Athlon-stuff, I decided to beef up the information about AMD's new CPU on this website. It's most likely that we at Tom's Hardware are the first to present Athlon at clock speeds of 500, 550, 700 and 750 MHz and thus we didn't want to waste any more time and decided to post our findings.
He performs his usual array of out-dated CPU and system tests, and dazzles us with numbers (which I admit, do favour the Athlon) and charts. In one instance (the expedable demo) the PIII with it's SSE instructions comes a little closer to the Athlons levels. His response to this made me laugh, I mean really laugh, when this guy takes to something he really does push it all the way...
Expendable shows that the battle between Athlon and Pentium III becomes closer as soon as a game favorites ISSE-enhancements over 3DNow!-enhancements. That's where Intel will try to intervene, making sure that software uses ISSE and not 3DNow!. It's the only way to make Pentium III look good or at least reasonable against Athlon.
OK, sorry for boring you good Matrox folk. I have nothing against AMD, I own an AMD system, I just don't like it when people try to pass off personal opinions as a "review". I really need to stop reading his stuff, he really does have his head up his arse.
Dave K
------------------
Agent31™. All comments Copyright © 1999 Agent31. All rights reserved.
Comment