G400 MAX review and Q3A results

[3dGameMan]

Sorry, I forgot to put the MAX in the G400 on last post of the subject. Vist http://www.3dgameman.com and go into the review section

Regards,
http://www.3dgameman.com

[Nuno]

I replyed in your other post, but here´s a bit of copy/paste:

This is from your *ahem* review

Also remember that these G400 drivers are in beta v5.13 (no openGL ICD).

So should you get a TNT2U or a Matrox G400 Max? Go for the Matrox G400 if you are into a kick ass 3D/2D card with tons of features but no openGL ICD, YET!!

So tell me how you have managed to get 36 fps in Q3? Software rendering, perhaps?

Drivers 5.13 are NOT beta. They are final drivers.
The G400 HAS an ICD since the very first release. The ICD is installed when you install the drivers. The ICD is not beta, it´s also a final version. One could argue that it needs some improvement, but it HAS one.

About the Mhz speeds, you surely know your milleage may vary according to the quality of that particular piece of hardware. Some (maybe few) will do the 245 Mhz dance, soe wont.

And please don´t publish misleading info on your site.


[This message has been edited by Nuno (edited 08-25-1999).]

[Kruzin]

UH...yea...why do you mention twice in the 2 paragraph "review" that there in no OGL...no ICD...HELLO!?!?

[3dGameMan]

Thanks for the feedback (negative as it may be), I will change. Sorry about that....

Regards,
http://www.3dgameman.com

[LAMFDTK]

Its hard to get hits on a new web-site Good luck.

[M Ragsdale]

.....take your protein pills and put your helmut on.


Rags



------------------
Some people call me the Space Cowboy.....

[Buuri]

Yeah looks like he fixed 'no ICD' to 'beta ICD'..
A little does he know.

_
B

[KvHagedorn]

to the new forum