3DMark99 Results?????

[JoeDredd]

Can anyone tell me if this ok for my K62 400

2650 5198cpu 3d marks?

highest i have had is 2691

my system is

K62 400
160mb PC100
GVC 1541 ali Mobo
8.4gb W/D H/D
Pioneer 32/6 DVD
BTC 40X CDrom
Windows98 SE
Matrox G400 D/H 32mb

John

[Electric Amish]

Sorry, but I can't tell you if that's good or bad, but whoever does will need to know what resolution you ran that test in....

Paul

[Himself]

That's a low score but about right for a K6-2 400 and a G400, I would try to go for a higher bus rate to bring it up a bit, you should get at least 2800-2900. A TNT 1 would give you faster results at low resolutions, ie 800x600 and lower, the G400 is about high resolutions only. Until some magical drivers come along or Matrox admits the lack of a hardware triangle setup, you'll never know why that is. If you really want faster numbers get a new cpu or a different video card or play the driver waiting game.

[NoClue]

Hi JoeDredd

your 2650 sounds VERY low for your system specs! I suggest you're running the benchmark "just as it starts up", 800x600x16

I get 2748 (with 3811 CPUmarks) with these settings and this with a G200-8mb (compared to your G400-32mb!!)

my system:
PII-400, 128mb pc100, AGP2x, G200-8mb

greetings
NoClue

[Guyver]

My old K6-2 400 in an Epox MVP3G mobo with a Mystique G200 8MB was able to hit...

640x480x16 - 4400+ 3dMarks (I occasionaly hit/passed the 4500 mark)..

Guyv

[JoeDredd]

Sorry Guys forgot to tell you what res i was running it in

800x600 16bit

Any ideas if a K63 450 would change the result drastically?

I will be getting one at the end of the year as well as a Athlon 650

[Himself]

I get around 3418 with a K6-3 448 at 800x600x16 and a G400 32MB

[Speedy]

lol, when i overclock my G400, scores go down, and everything else goes up, isn't it weird
Also
IF u have a winmodem, and trying to test your system when internet is on, don't do it, cause i have a winmodem, and when it is on, i get about a 1000 points less on 3d marks, my scores are in my sig, but it is a bid different system, though it is amd, lol
If u have a winmodem, TURN IT OFF!

by the way, compare to some ppl who have similar systems on 3dfiles.com and here, i got LOW ASS scores, anybody have any suggestions?

------------------
Matrox Millennium G400 Dual Head - English
Resolution 800*600
Color Depth 16-bit Color
Frame Buffer Triple buffering
Refresh Rate VSync Off
CPU Optimization AMD 3DNow!(tm)
3DMark Result 5420.49 3DMarks
Synthetic CPU 3D Speed 9142.76 CPU 3DMarks
Rasterizer Score 2206.33 3DRasterMarks
Game 1 - Race 63.58 FPS
Game 2 - First Person 47.24 FPS
Processor Type AMD-K7(tm) Processor
Processor Speed 500 MHz
Physical Memory 128 MB



[This message has been edited by Speedy (edited 10-06-1999).]

[anid]

With a K6-3 450@504 on an Epox MVP3G-M and a Mill G200 16MB SD I have been able to post about 3300 3DMarks at 800x600x16. Of course, that is with the card running at 246MHz...

------------------
I say "Here's a monkey wrench... If you bop me over the head with it long enough I maight wake up for a second."

[Zagarus]

Well lately I have been playing with 3dmark quite some and got few results. My system is P2 400mhz 128mb ram, G400 16mb singlehead.Project Settings (Template):
Rendering Platform: Internal (Matrox Millennium G400 - English)
Resolution: 800*600
Color Depth: 16-bit Color
CPU Optimization: Intel(r) processor
Z-Buffer: 16-bit
Frame Buffer: Triple buffering
Refresh Rate: VSync Off
Looping: Disabled
Texture Format: 16-bit, 4444 RGBA
Run Tests: Once
Title Screen: Shown

Test Results:

3DMark Result : 3,554 3DMarks
Synthetic CPU 3D Speed : 3,907 CPU 3DMarks
Rasterizer Score : 2,459 3DRasterMarks
Game 1 - Race: 34.6 FPS
Game 2 - First Person: 36.5 FPS
Fill Rate : 244.4 MTexels/s
Fill Rate With Multi-Texturing : 239.9 MTexels/s
2MB Texture Rendering Speed: 364.2 FPS
4MB Texture Rendering Speed: 287.5 FPS
8MB Texture Rendering Speed: 197.4 FPS
16MB Texture Rendering Speed: 98.0 FPS
32MB Texture Rendering Speed: 50.2 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 3-pass: 105.1 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 2-pass: 133.3 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 1-pass: 216.9 FPS
Point Sample Texture Filtering Speed: 112.6 %
Bilinear Texture Filtering Speed: 100.0 %
Trilinear Texture Filtering Speed: 74.1 %

these results are with 150/200 clock settings for G400. Followings are with baseclock.

Test Results:
3DMark Result : 3,526 3DMarks
Synthetic CPU 3D Speed : 3,874 CPU 3DMarks
Rasterizer Score : 2,071 3DRasterMarks
Game 1 - Race: 34.5 FPS
Game 2 - First Person: 36.1 FPS
Fill Rate : 205.3 MTexels/s
Fill Rate With Multi-Texturing : 202.0 MTexels/s
2MB Texture Rendering Speed: 297.7 FPS
4MB Texture Rendering Speed: 237.4 FPS
8MB Texture Rendering Speed: 164.1 FPS
16MB Texture Rendering Speed: 90.3 FPS
32MB Texture Rendering Speed: 47.2 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 3-pass: 90.8 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 2-pass: 116.2 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 1-pass: 195.1 FPS
Point Sample Texture Filtering Speed: 112.7 %
Bilinear Texture Filtering Speed: 100.0 %
Trilinear Texture Filtering Speed: 73.9 %

What I'm surprised is that even tho I see significant improvement in other results..I get practically no improvement in game 1 or 2..so I guess the bottleneck is my P2 400?
Anyway..not quite sure how slow K6-2 is compared to 400P2 but I would guess you should get atleast somewhat better scores.