I'm planning to get a G400 and I would like some input here.
My system Cel 400@500, 128 mg PC100, 17" monitor (1280x1024@60 Hz max), SBlive, etc...
I have a few question:
1) Is the OpenGl been improved well (I'm a previous G200 owner...)
2) Is the TurboGl increasing speed even in non PIII or non-Athlon system (i.e Celeron ?).
3) Since I'm playing mostly at 1024x768, is a 16 Meg card enough or should I go to the 32 meg card ?
4) Is the card overclockable ?
5) Are the issue with Half-life been addressed ? (I'm a Huge fan of TFC)
I know about image quality of the G400 so please no need to tell me that it is the most oustanding, I know it. ( I've owned a RAGE 2+, RIVA128, Rendition V2200, G200, TNT1, V3 2000, so I know basically the difference in image quality (never saw EBM in action tough....).
Any input would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
jackzod
[This message has been edited by jackzod (edited 28 October 1999).]
[This message has been edited by jackzod (edited 28 October 1999).]
My system Cel 400@500, 128 mg PC100, 17" monitor (1280x1024@60 Hz max), SBlive, etc...
I have a few question:
1) Is the OpenGl been improved well (I'm a previous G200 owner...)
2) Is the TurboGl increasing speed even in non PIII or non-Athlon system (i.e Celeron ?).
3) Since I'm playing mostly at 1024x768, is a 16 Meg card enough or should I go to the 32 meg card ?
4) Is the card overclockable ?
5) Are the issue with Half-life been addressed ? (I'm a Huge fan of TFC)
I know about image quality of the G400 so please no need to tell me that it is the most oustanding, I know it. ( I've owned a RAGE 2+, RIVA128, Rendition V2200, G200, TNT1, V3 2000, so I know basically the difference in image quality (never saw EBM in action tough....).
Any input would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
jackzod
[This message has been edited by jackzod (edited 28 October 1999).]
[This message has been edited by jackzod (edited 28 October 1999).]
Comment