Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rage Fury Vs G200, G400(ronnie read this)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rage Fury Vs G200, G400(ronnie read this)

    Just so Ronnie can read this, my friend has a p3 550E@733, with an i820 board, and a Fury Pro that means agp4x, i had an abit be6-2, with a p3 500E at 650, he got 5.9 in final reality with his 32meg, Rage Fury PRO, i got 5.84 with my 16megG200, and a clock speed disatvantage running only at 1xagp, and in 3dmark2k, he gets 2300 with the Fury Pro, i get 1980 with my G200 that is what a year older then the Fury pro? maybe 2???
    ATI has not yet been able to beet Matrox, nor will they ever!!
    DV

  • #2
    This works both ways.
    I'm not going to let him/her flabe bait the MURCers, and I'm not going to let the MURCers flame bait him/her.

    This type of post (especially directed at one individual specifically in the topic) will only encourage the type of flame wars it took us so long to get away from (anyone else remember the great G200/TNT BBQ fests)

    We are not going to let it get that way again.
    Core2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494s

    Comment

    Working...
    X