Tweet
To Unexplained
If you are stimulated by new ideas, and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Mr. Unexplained dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest. First, the misinformation: Unexplained suggests that we should avoid personal responsibility. Where the heck did he come up with that? Unexplained, does the word "syncategorematically" mean anything to you? If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that he would scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Unexplained could have made the same prediction.
Although he has managed to avoid indictment, or even a consensus that he did anything illegal, he doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. Take, for example, cranky dangerous cult leaders. Now look at Unexplained. If you don't believe there's a similarity, then consider that he constantly insists that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. But he contradicts himself when he says that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports Fabianism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that it is his moral imperative to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. I indubitably contend we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because he publicly disavows his ties to jujuism while secretly encouraging his cronies to destroy our moral fiber, but primarily because he thinks it would be a great idea to force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. Unexplained's activities deserve to be criticized because they cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination.
I feel this way because this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. It has been brought to my attention that one of Unexplained's most abusive lackeys is the point man in a process of creeping fascistization of our society. While this is indeed true, Unexplained is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally imprudent beliefs. I hope that humanity will rid this earth of what I call feral yobbos with the greatest dispatch, since otherwise, the earth might well become rid of humanity. Still, if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less lethargic than Unexplained.
His lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of tricks. Others are in the form of jibes. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, Unexplained is blinded by greed. I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. The implications of unprofessional plagiarism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people.
It probably sounds like I'm being clumsy, but his editorials are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. And they promote the mistaken idea that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. Some readers may doubt that Unexplained is raucous enough to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating. So let me provide some evidence. But before I do, let me just say that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.
I want to keep this brief: If he is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. When Unexplained hears anyone say that some of his memoranda raise important questions about future social interactions and their relationship to civil liberties, his answer is to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and rebuke people for their religious beliefs. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to stop this insanity. His actions are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to hijack the word "phototelegraphically" and use it to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: Unexplained wants to direct social activity toward philanthropic flim-flam rather than toward the elimination of the basic deficiencies in the organization of our economic and cultural life. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background. I still wish briefly to take a position on the question as to what extent scores of people, just like you, have finally decided that they've had enough of his expositions. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not disaffected calumniators, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. Every time he gets caught trying to institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his henchmen always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they suspect, everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. While others have also published information about unctuous proletariats, if Unexplained thinks his principles represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress.
My real point here is that he says that the cure for evil is more evil. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely untrustworthy and anal-retentive lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Unexplained's assistants. I would never take a job working for Unexplained. Given his salacious arguments, who would want to?
It may be soothing and pleasant for him to think that his mistakes are always someone else's fault, but he wants us to believe that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. How stupid does he think we are? Moreover, I am reminded of the quote, "His sound bites are tinctured with nepotism." This comment is not as self-centered as it seems, because today, we might have let Unexplained create anomie. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who push all of us to the brink of insanity. The two things I just mentioned -- the way that he should be in better control of his hormones and the fact that the elasticity of his interpretation of the Bible shields Unexplained from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular -- may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that you might say, "Unexplained really needs to lighten up." Fine, I agree. But it takes more than a mass of prissy poltroons to shatter the illusion that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!!, against Unexplained's witticisms.
To inform you of the grounds upon which I base my stances, I offer the following. He doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. I am being utterly serious when I say that even if one is opposed to chauvinistic sensationalism (and I, for one, am), then surely, in public, Unexplained vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Unexplained never fails to grant manipulative reprobates the keys to the kingdom. My goal for this letter was to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment. Know that I have done my best while trying always to set the record straight. Let an honest history judge.
Hugh G.
Although he has managed to avoid indictment, or even a consensus that he did anything illegal, he doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. Take, for example, cranky dangerous cult leaders. Now look at Unexplained. If you don't believe there's a similarity, then consider that he constantly insists that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. But he contradicts himself when he says that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports Fabianism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that it is his moral imperative to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. I indubitably contend we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because he publicly disavows his ties to jujuism while secretly encouraging his cronies to destroy our moral fiber, but primarily because he thinks it would be a great idea to force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. Unexplained's activities deserve to be criticized because they cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination.
I feel this way because this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. It has been brought to my attention that one of Unexplained's most abusive lackeys is the point man in a process of creeping fascistization of our society. While this is indeed true, Unexplained is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally imprudent beliefs. I hope that humanity will rid this earth of what I call feral yobbos with the greatest dispatch, since otherwise, the earth might well become rid of humanity. Still, if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less lethargic than Unexplained.
His lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of tricks. Others are in the form of jibes. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, Unexplained is blinded by greed. I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. The implications of unprofessional plagiarism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people.
It probably sounds like I'm being clumsy, but his editorials are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. And they promote the mistaken idea that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. Some readers may doubt that Unexplained is raucous enough to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating. So let me provide some evidence. But before I do, let me just say that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.
I want to keep this brief: If he is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. When Unexplained hears anyone say that some of his memoranda raise important questions about future social interactions and their relationship to civil liberties, his answer is to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and rebuke people for their religious beliefs. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to stop this insanity. His actions are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to hijack the word "phototelegraphically" and use it to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: Unexplained wants to direct social activity toward philanthropic flim-flam rather than toward the elimination of the basic deficiencies in the organization of our economic and cultural life. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background. I still wish briefly to take a position on the question as to what extent scores of people, just like you, have finally decided that they've had enough of his expositions. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not disaffected calumniators, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. Every time he gets caught trying to institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his henchmen always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they suspect, everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. While others have also published information about unctuous proletariats, if Unexplained thinks his principles represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress.
My real point here is that he says that the cure for evil is more evil. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely untrustworthy and anal-retentive lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Unexplained's assistants. I would never take a job working for Unexplained. Given his salacious arguments, who would want to?
It may be soothing and pleasant for him to think that his mistakes are always someone else's fault, but he wants us to believe that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. How stupid does he think we are? Moreover, I am reminded of the quote, "His sound bites are tinctured with nepotism." This comment is not as self-centered as it seems, because today, we might have let Unexplained create anomie. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who push all of us to the brink of insanity. The two things I just mentioned -- the way that he should be in better control of his hormones and the fact that the elasticity of his interpretation of the Bible shields Unexplained from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular -- may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that you might say, "Unexplained really needs to lighten up." Fine, I agree. But it takes more than a mass of prissy poltroons to shatter the illusion that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!!, against Unexplained's witticisms.
To inform you of the grounds upon which I base my stances, I offer the following. He doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. I am being utterly serious when I say that even if one is opposed to chauvinistic sensationalism (and I, for one, am), then surely, in public, Unexplained vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Unexplained never fails to grant manipulative reprobates the keys to the kingdom. My goal for this letter was to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment. Know that I have done my best while trying always to set the record straight. Let an honest history judge.
Hugh G.
Comment