OK....got my test card late last week.
32megDDR Millennium G450 DH.
Installed it in my work PC today. It replaces an ATI Rage Pro 8meg AGP.
Now lets get one thing straight. This card is aimed for OEMs, and not really intended to be a gamers dream card (yes, I know marketing is also saying it's a game card, but it's true bulk of sales will be to the OEMs). Don't expect to see high benchmarks compaired to other current cards from other makers. Don't even expect to see high benchmarks compaired to it's G400 predecessor. Bottom line: If you currently have a 32meg G400DH or MAX, there is no reason whatsoever to move to a G450.
BUT....if you need to upgrade from an older card (as I did with my ATI powered office rig), and if the almighty FPS score doesn't interest you, G450 is a good choice for an all-around/office type card.
The card installed without a hitch, after removing all ATI drivers, swapping cards, setting up as standard VGA, then installing the drivers (yes, it uses the same drivers as G400). After it was up and running, I hooked up my second monitor, and enabled DualHead Multi-Display. I then spent the day enjoying AutoCAD the way it should be, and annoying my boss by pointing out every little thing the G450 did better than the ATI. Brighter colors. Smoother 2D. Stable cursor. Double the desktop. No corrupt fonts. Better panning and zooming. Faster redraws and regens.
Basically, I'm a happy camper, and quite pleased with the card for what I will be using it for.
-ps...there will be no overclocking, games or benchmarks for this card in my world. I still have my O/C'd G400 for that in my home system
-pps...standard betaboys NDA rules apply. I can't answer questions about clock speeds, registry settings, benchmark scores, etc.
32megDDR Millennium G450 DH.
Installed it in my work PC today. It replaces an ATI Rage Pro 8meg AGP.
Now lets get one thing straight. This card is aimed for OEMs, and not really intended to be a gamers dream card (yes, I know marketing is also saying it's a game card, but it's true bulk of sales will be to the OEMs). Don't expect to see high benchmarks compaired to other current cards from other makers. Don't even expect to see high benchmarks compaired to it's G400 predecessor. Bottom line: If you currently have a 32meg G400DH or MAX, there is no reason whatsoever to move to a G450.
BUT....if you need to upgrade from an older card (as I did with my ATI powered office rig), and if the almighty FPS score doesn't interest you, G450 is a good choice for an all-around/office type card.
The card installed without a hitch, after removing all ATI drivers, swapping cards, setting up as standard VGA, then installing the drivers (yes, it uses the same drivers as G400). After it was up and running, I hooked up my second monitor, and enabled DualHead Multi-Display. I then spent the day enjoying AutoCAD the way it should be, and annoying my boss by pointing out every little thing the G450 did better than the ATI. Brighter colors. Smoother 2D. Stable cursor. Double the desktop. No corrupt fonts. Better panning and zooming. Faster redraws and regens.
Basically, I'm a happy camper, and quite pleased with the card for what I will be using it for.
-ps...there will be no overclocking, games or benchmarks for this card in my world. I still have my O/C'd G400 for that in my home system
-pps...standard betaboys NDA rules apply. I can't answer questions about clock speeds, registry settings, benchmark scores, etc.
Comment