In every rumour I have seen about the G800, the DualBus architecture has yet to be mentioned, despite the fact that in every rumour I've seen, the listed amount of bandwidth is not sufficient to supply the G800s fill-rate. I mean 200Mhz 128-bit DDR is good, but it isn't enough to fill 1800 texels, especially at 32-bit.
Does anyone have any theories on this? I mean , if people were just making up specs, then I think they would probably include the Dualbus, seeing as it has been on every Matrox card since the G200.
Is there some technical reason the Dualbus wouldn't work in that configuration?
We know that Matrox has utilized the Dualbus architecture in the following configurations:
64-bit, SDR (G200)
128-bit, SDR (G400)
64-bit DDR (G450)
Is there some constraint on current DDR memory that says it can't do Dualbus at 128-bit?
I could write a whole bunch of other stuff on why Matrox needs the dual-bus, but I just want any info I can get here.
Does anyone have any theories on this? I mean , if people were just making up specs, then I think they would probably include the Dualbus, seeing as it has been on every Matrox card since the G200.
Is there some technical reason the Dualbus wouldn't work in that configuration?
We know that Matrox has utilized the Dualbus architecture in the following configurations:
64-bit, SDR (G200)
128-bit, SDR (G400)
64-bit DDR (G450)
Is there some constraint on current DDR memory that says it can't do Dualbus at 128-bit?
I could write a whole bunch of other stuff on why Matrox needs the dual-bus, but I just want any info I can get here.
Comment