Tweet
More G800 news...?
Hey everyone! Look what I just dug up!
Based on integral subsystem considerations, the fully integrated test program requires considerable systems analysis and trade-off studies to arrive at the G800's evolution of specifications over a given time period. In respect to specific goals, any associated supporting element presents extremely interesting challenges to the G800's greater fight-worthiness concept.
From a top-level view, the product assurance architecture is functionally equivalent and parallel to the Matrox' postulated use of dialog management technology. In retrospect, the interrelation of system and/or subsystem technologies adds overriding performance constraints to the Matrox's G800 Graphical Processing Unit's total system rationale. Interestingly enough, any associated supporting element recognises other systems' importance and the necessity for and G800 discrete configuration mode. Inparticular, a large portion of interface coordination communication must utilise and be functionally interwoven with the G800's sophisticated physical layer.
Can anyone guess the source?
------------------
Cheers,
Steve
"Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"
[This message has been edited by SteveC (edited 24 November 2000).]
Based on integral subsystem considerations, the fully integrated test program requires considerable systems analysis and trade-off studies to arrive at the G800's evolution of specifications over a given time period. In respect to specific goals, any associated supporting element presents extremely interesting challenges to the G800's greater fight-worthiness concept.
From a top-level view, the product assurance architecture is functionally equivalent and parallel to the Matrox' postulated use of dialog management technology. In retrospect, the interrelation of system and/or subsystem technologies adds overriding performance constraints to the Matrox's G800 Graphical Processing Unit's total system rationale. Interestingly enough, any associated supporting element recognises other systems' importance and the necessity for and G800 discrete configuration mode. Inparticular, a large portion of interface coordination communication must utilise and be functionally interwoven with the G800's sophisticated physical layer.
Can anyone guess the source?
------------------
Cheers,
Steve
"Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"
[This message has been edited by SteveC (edited 24 November 2000).]
Comment